…I would add that players themselves , although not blameless, are not the root cause. Very few players who make it to the first team have any connection with club… Most of the youth developed are discarded early as a wide net is cast to try and net a few gems … So like with any job when there is a chance of a massive pay rise at a rival firm, why would you not seriously want to go. Let’s be honest most footballers are not the brightest… It’s why they are so easily led into believing they need an agent in the first place…,… Taking 15% of their income when a decent lawyer looking over contracts would be more than adequate… It’s set up to be corrupt from the moment FIFA started issuing licenses for agents … Which you have to pay for.
its also a classic conflict of interest as Agents will work in what is in THEIR own interest and not within the normal business practices. But clubs need to recognise that if they want players to honour contracts, then they need to to honour them as well… Many do sell as soon as big offer comes in regardless off whether the player is really interested or ready…or if their family want it. If clubs and agents commoditise people, we can’t be surprised that the commodity goes the same way.
Inknow it’s a cliche that the ‘Money’ has fucked the game… And we can sky… For me it’s not the money, that filters into the game, but how it’s distributed, and more importantly that SKY have in effect created more commercial value for only certain clubs. By deciding from the off that they would show more of Man U et all games, they create better value for MAN U sponsors, , more exposure, more fans etc… This made the revenue gap so much wider - a gap that continues to grow, and one in that many modern fans seem to think has always existed, as they were not around when Forest or Derby could win the league… It’s what has led to their arrogant seance of entitlement… That and the fact most are a bit fucking thick…
But the biggest con, is that the Premierleague and Sky connive to keep it going. Because sky need the subscribers, which means they feature more of those clubs… And the Premier need the buy in from those clubs to prevent them doing their own deals… The lesser clubs go along because it means they get more… Forgetting that it’s NOT the size of your revenue that is important, but the gap between you and what is needed for success… And that gap just gets bigger and bigger. This is great for fans of the 4 or 5 clubs with that premium position, but shit for everyone else. Such domination by a few is not healthy for the competition , but it is very healthy for the revenue of the clubs and broadcasters… Letting countries put 3 or 4 teams into the CL is also pile of shit… I still think it would be great to just have 1 pan EU competition based on the FA cup model, with countries getting 10-12 places etc…great for fans and would avoid 'I want CLmfootball shit cliches, but would never be agreed by top clubs who want that revenue for themselves… Not even the CL revenue, but the value this exposure has for your brand and commercial sponsorship…
There is no answer, you can’t turn the clock back… And we ourselves took advantage of this disparity in our return fromL1. Other sports put salary caps in place to try and avoid a monopoly on success of the few, but with ‘image rights’ and the benefits of being at a club with more media exposure to a players individual commercial value, mean they do not work in levelling the playing field. Budget caps don’t work either… There will no doubt come a time when their are 20 global teams who play in a franchised world league, but even then we would still have this domestic situation, just the smug satisfaction that the cunts from Liverpool would most likely not be part of the global league 