Except no one watches Question Time.
We send the EU Ā£350m a week letās fund our NHS instead.
A clear intention to fund our NHS instead of sending Ā£350m a week to the EU.
A statement that informed people knew was a misrepresentation of the truth, and would never happen - so they didnāt vote for what is likely to be a chaotic planless decade of clusterfuck - run by millionaires, for millionaires.
1 Like
One statement, one command and two suggestions.
Technically, the statement is the only thing you can dispute. People can ignore commands if they donāt respect the authority that issues them, just as they can reject suggestion.
Furthermore, the EU rebate is something that other EU states want to get rid of. Itās a unique arrangement, and not guaranteed. There are groups actively trying to get it abolished.
Originally posted by @pap
Originally posted by @Saint-or-sinner
āLetās give our NHS the Ā£350 the EU takes every weekā.
This is a lie, as we have never given the EU that amount. The rebate was deducted before any payment was made, so itās a lie to say they have ever taken it.
Post the other three sentences please. It would be interesting to see how many people consider them factually correct. I did say please Pap(twice now).
Here you go in all its glory.
This is why I asked you to to post the four sentence(still waiting). The bus is worded differently to the posters.
My point still stands, because we have never sent this money(just like the EU has never taken it). A clear lie.
I have no issue with how you voted(apart from the fucking greedy Nazi halfwit twats you have knowingly put all our fates in) but that statement is a lie and I struggle to see how you can defend it.
Ever going to post the four sentences, in the wording that you wish to debate? Iām intrigued, because i assume thatās by far the weakest. Would be impressed if you have found a truth in any of it.
Seriously why are you guys arguing about which side told the biggest whopper? They both did or at least made extraordinary claim about one course of action or another.
it is a bit like Cherts and Barry arguing about who the biggest cunt is. Circular, well trodden and pointless.
3 Likes
I thought Whopper was trade marked by Barry apart from when Bearsy sold one to a punter ?
As a late entrant for the incredibly competitive Forum Pedant of the Year competition could I just highlight that the small L makes it one sentence, not Papās one statement and one command.
Itās one sentence - that has since been exposed as a broken promise, a lie, a twisting of the truth, it is no more, itās a dead parrot, a bit like this small debate.
Worse than that, the grammar on the bus is appalling.
That should have set alarm bells ringing.
1 Like
More debt for students:
More debt for studentās parents you mean ?
Thatās why I bothered giving a fuck 
Originally posted by @Goatboy
Originally posted by @PhilippineSaint
More debt for studentās parents you mean ?
Thatās why I bothered giving a fuck
I understand your position but as an expat all my kids education has had to be paid for by either myself or if I could swing it the company i was employed by. This is why I am not retired yet.
Yeah but you can use your tax savings 
What tax savings I paid over 25,000 dollars tax last year to the Brazilian and Malaysian governments according to the letterās I received from them and can claim none of it back because I live in the Philippines.
admittedly the Company paid the tax in Malaysia and Brazil but why cant I claim it back 
Is Labuan hospitality tax deductible?
That goes on expenses 
2 Likes
The Tories may have a problem with Theresa.
U.K. Prime Minister Theresa May is increasingly isolated as her demands to control all areas of policy alienate key colleagues, according to more than a dozen officials who worry tensions will undermine planning for Brexit.
Speaking anonymously because the subject is delicate, many of the government figures said an early period of goodwill toward May had given way to division and resentment, leading to policy mistakes that had to be hastily corrected. Much of that stems from the influence wielded by her joint chiefs-of-staff, Fiona Hill and Nick Timothy, the people said.
āThis sounds like echoes of the end of the Thatcher era with ministers feeling it would be wrong to risk her wrath and stifling rational concerns,āā said Richard Hayton, who teaches politics at the University of Leeds, England. Itās the feeling that the prime ministerās office āis too much in the bunker.ā
Now that the British Red Cross has declared that the pressures on our NHS have resulted in a āhumanitarian crisisā, itās nice to see so much of fact dodging cunt cannon Jeremy Hunt on TV, explaining wtf heās going to do about it.
1 Like
Liberal Democrat leader Tim Farron said: "It is easy to stand up and recite hollow words but it is clear that this Conservative Brexit prime minister has absolutely no commitment to tackling social injustices and divisions - we only have to look at her record.
"May has used every opportunity to dismiss the concerns of those who donāt agree with her - donāt forget she branded those who believe that we are all citizens of the world to be ācitizens of nowhereā.
āShe has failed to put the money into our NHS that is needed, and leads a government happy to churn out nasty, divisive rhetoric and initiatives at any opportunity.ā
I donāt know who this Farron bloke is but he makes some valid points.
Iāve seen little of the manifesto that was going to help hardworking families, improve the NHS, policing, and care for the vulnerable and the old.
It looks a little like those promises may have been a load of old bollocks.
2 Likes
4 Likes