Whereas Ukraine is really simple isnāt it?
Putin is Hitler and heās looking to roll across Europe. According to you.
Whereas Ukraine is really simple isnāt it?
Putin is Hitler and heās looking to roll across Europe. According to you.
As soon as we mention the appalling acts of violence committed by the invading forces of Russia you can guarantee a swipe at the west will follow in a response, its ignorant, misplaced and wrong.
Donāt dilute and divert this, the acts allegedly committed here are unseen in many peoples lifetime, the amounts of deaths and the rapidity of them is unseen in generations.
He is acting like Hitler, only a fool would deny that.
Mass graves, civilians killed hands tied behind their backs, raping, looting, staged events to propel an invasion.
He could also be likened to Stalin, he murdered more Soviets than their war effort did in repelling the Nazis, that part of history isnāt popular though by them, its a reality though.
I am not denigrating what is happening in Ukraine, it is shocking and a tragedy for the people of Ukraine. But these events didnāt just happen in a vacuum, the narrative that Putin woke up one morning and decided to launch an invasion because he is evil, mad and the new Hitler is simplistic and naive. Trying to put some context on it doesnāt mean you automatically want to suck Putinās cock, that is unworthy of you.
You state that nobody on here supports US and UK hypocrisy, but the proof of the pudding is in the eating. Many are calling for Putin to be prosecuted for war crimes, quite rightly, it is undoubtedly a just cause, but could you point me to any posts from them over the years where they call for US/UK politicians to be prosecuted for the horrific war crimes that have been committed in our name? I would be interested to read them.
I think youāre bias blind, I think everyone on here would love to see Blair in the Hague alongside Bush.
Your using equivalence to mount a position to blame the west, I can go through all the posts from the last 5 and half weeks if you wish to be fair to you and the others?
The west arenāt responsible for Russian soldiers killing civilians, Putin is.
The west arenāt responsible for Russians losing their standard of living, Putin is.
The west arenāt responsible for Russians committing crimes that are directly against the Geneva convention, Putin is.
Less but but but and whatabouts, Blair is a war criminal in my eyes and so is Bush, Yemen is a mess, as is the middle east, equating the two or many is letting yourself down though, Iāll repeat no one on here will die on that hill of supporting Blair. Youāre barking up the wrong tree.
Seems this thread has now deviated from the original reason it was set up.
Thereās an interesting video on Rumble on that.
Isnāt Rumble that right wing app - waiting to fail when Trumpās neo-Nazi site finally goes live ()?
No censorship. So yes, quite a few right wingers on there.
Havenāt looked - just going on here say - and we all know how that goes.
Joe Rogan might end up there one day. Their CEO penned an open letter, same or more money than Spotify. I think he has already had to delete a shitload of the videos that used to be on YouTube.
113 episodes gone, listed here.
Mariana Vishegirskaya, a pregnant resident of Donetsk
Hmmm something is suspicious here, can you see it?
Also why solely believe her when there are many testimonies out there that say the contrary, muddying the waters, Pap why are you posting and linking a pro Russian piece of media? Grayzone is utter shite, could you at least link something that credible and not laughable.
Iām sure you know this crap of a site is pro China- anti-Uyghur, pro Assad and definitely pro Russian.
Its not credible and only serves to confuse.
And why are you not questioning western media too then?
Especially as the pictures that the Associated Press are getting have Azov Battalion watermarks. e.g. The same units that have been killing civilians in Donbass for eight years.
Of course I do, it can be verified though or here is the thing if it canāt it states it hasnāt been verified so you can file it either as propaganda or not, for instance from your own viewings what is your stance on Bucha, war crimes or propaganda?
Press using stock picture shocker.
You do realise that some of these accounts are based on one source. Thatās it. In some cases, there are several counter-sources disagreeing with this one source, including eye-witnesses.
I suppose theyāre useful when theyāre victims, not so useful when they break from the official Azov-created narrative.
Still, letās go to World War 3 on the basis of limited footage from neo-Nazis whoāve been involved in exactly the same sort of atrocities they accuse others of in the eight years leading up to this.