Hereâs a good example why you shouldnât trust the guardian on certain matters.
"The documents were published by Bellingcat, an online platform that began with investigations of attacks in Syria, and the Russian investigative outlet The Insider. Both sites also specialised in uncovering information about Russian soldiers active in Ukraine since 2014.â
Documents reveal Salisbury poisoning suspectsâ Russian defence ministry ties
Bellingcat?
Thatâs your source?
If the guardian had bothered to check, that article was shown in itâs true light, the day before their article. Bellingcat(Atlantic Council) have been shown multiple times to distort the truth on an epic scale.
Just read the original and then the comments below, if in doubt.
Shocking what the guardian is prepared to regurgitate.
They were just two Russian guys (possibly gay now), who had had links to the Russian defence ministry and were on a weekend trip to see the old clock at Salisbury Abbey. Via a cheap hotel in London and flying straight back on Aeroflot. Nothing to see here, itâs an MI5/MSM/deepstate/lefty conspiracy.
Links to Russian defence ministry?
As in, they were conscripted for two years as every fit male was till a few years ago.
Bellingcat has been shown time and time again for what it is and that reflects on the guardian for printing it as not just a sources(read the bit i highlighted) , but the gospel of sources(if only they had checked the comments).
It was ridiculed at least half a day before hand and the guardian didnât check. Thatâs unforgivable for anyone you want to trust as a news source, or do you disagree?
Is it still an MI5 conspiracy? Or, I lose track here. Itâs now a made up story by The Guardian? Who is this Bellingcat?
Read it all again Ted. Itâs relatively simple.
Sorry, forgot to add, itâs MI6.
They get very annoyed if you donât use capitals and theyâd probably shoot(or Novichok) you if you called them 5.
Please remember this, it could save your life 
I read it before. "An ongoing Bellingcat investigation conducted jointly with The Insider Russia has confirmed through uncovered passport data that the two Russian nationals identified by UK authorities as prime suspects in the Novichok poisonings on British soil are linked to Russian security services.
âBellingcat has been shown time and time again for what it is and that reflects on the guardian for printing it as not just a sources(read the bit i highlighted) , but the gospel of sourcesâ
gospel of sources read highlighted bit
Scotland Yard has said that they believe Petrov and Boshirov to be pseudonyms and that the menâs real identities have been covered up by the Russian government.
They were making it up too 
Have you looked at âthe insider Russiaâ and their source, or just taken it as gospel?
Have you read any comments on the original yet?
Get back to me when you have.
So, what was actually uncovered? Has it been shared I. e. Can we see it or do we accept their say so? Was whatever they have was obtained through legal channels? Have you seen it yourself?
Thought not.
Scotland Yard donât make stuff up, the family of Jean Charles De Menezes would be shocked to hear that.
Same person in charge of both investigations, funnily enough. Fuck up, get promoted. Bit like the guardian.
ok
Its called being promoted out of harms way.
Happens all the time in the oil industry.
Its too expensive to fire you so they promote you to a position where you can do less harm/damage.
Itâs worse than that. Their one âsourceâ is a bloke that was paid and when shown the stamp said âIâve never seen that, what do want me to sayâ(paraphrasing, but only slightly).
Then the ss bit, see above. It was ridiculed within 2 hours and thatâs my point. Read the guardian article and the authority it gives these idiots, whilst surely knowing whatâs happened.
I need this to happen to me. I want to be âpromotedâ and given a nice pay rise, have no responsibilities and in say 5 years worked out of the business with a nice parting settlementâŚ
Happy days.
You really dont like The Guardian
Ever worry that some are promoted âin harms wayâ.
politically and journalisticlly, itâs what weseem to favour.