Question is why is he a former British Ambassador ?
What did he get sacked for?
Asking awkward questions?
Perhaps he wasnât sacked?
Dunno.
Iâve long wondered how successive governments, and perhaps the civil service âmandarinsâ, guarantee the continued silence on the things that ministers and diplomats âknowâ (other than the official secret act).
I imagine an amazing pension and gongs like knighthoods and birthday honours help some to keep schtum.
Iâd always assumed that wasnât enough for Murray.
3 Likes
For exposing human rights violations in Uzbekistan. Obviously this just wouldnât do for our Foreign Office.
1 Like
He did indeed expose human rights violations in Uzbekistan, for which he was removed as Ambassador by Tony Blair in 2004. The Uzbekistan President was a monster, responsible for torturing his citizens, including, (allegedly) having people boiled alive. Blair received millions from this monster for 'an advisory role).
2 Likes
Novichok didnât kill him but it battered his immune systemâŚ
Itâs weird stuff, isnât it. Yulia looked so much healthier afterwards, but Charlie has given up hope(that might have happened when he took up heroin, which is also very bad for the immune system).
A complete farce, enacted by our own SS.
Any of these supposed journalists started looking into the mass of inconsistencies in the official fairytale yet?
Iâm particularly interested in the woman doctor(first responder) that apparently chose to disappear, despite being a witness to attempted murder. The police ok with that?
2 Likes
Completely farcical article kowtowing to the Govt line and putting 2+2 together to make 150
Irresponsible journalism - lacking corroborated âfactsâ and making unproved assertions about unproved actions by Russia. Do they take us for fools?
First paragraph.
âThe substance that killed a woman in Amesbury was the same Novichok nerve agent that poisoned Sergei and Yulia Skripal, experts have confirmed.â
How do they know itâs Novichok? The OPCW have only revealed that to member States.
"13. The name and structure of the identified toxic chemical are contained in the full
classified report of the Secretariat, available to all States Parties
1 Like
Youâve linked to an article about the President of Kazakhstan, no saint himself, but not on the same level as the President of Uzbekistan.
Umm, the OPCW were the independent experts corroborating the UKâs findings!! Second paragraph
The independent Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons report backs up the UK governmentâs findings.
Makes you wonder why they still refuse to name it, in any publicly available reports.
Why is that?
No problem naming things elsewhere(even though the chain of custody was broken).
Wonderful timing after yesterdayâs story. What they building everyone up for?
2 Likes
chemical attacks in Idlib? Those pesky Russians have form.
4 Likes
Iâd imagine that the Salisbury area is full of disease.
The two suspects flew out of Heathrow on 4th March and Rowley has told police he found a box, which he thought contained perfume, in the charity bin on Wednesday 27 June.
Thatâs 16 odd weeks without changing the bin. The place must be disgustingly filthy.
Charity bin was in Salisbury i presume, as the suspects donât appear to have visited Amesbury.
Also, wasnât it stated that he smashed the bottle? If so theyâve done a remarkable job of gluing it back together.
1 Like
lol
What a cock, if they were going to doctor the images they would at least get rid of the time.
The background is clearly different in both images so I would suggest that they are different cameras.
So up his own arseâŚ
2 Likes
Whatâs different in the background?
Looks the same(although slight difference in angle) on my cracked phone screen.
Yeah, slight change of angle, so how would you get that at the same time frame from the same camera?
Iâm guessing these are from the skyways to/from the planes, we all know that they are repeating units
