A tetra phone. Which is described like this by the makers.
āTETRA is used in a variety of different sectors, including public transport, the military, the police, at airports and by Police.
TETRA is specifically designed and optimised to serve mission critical organisations and their users.ā
Anyone else near that area that might just be interested in that type of communication?
My dad does volunteer work for RAYNET, they help with communications for events such as the Great Dorset Steam Fair and charity bike rides. He has loads of those types of radios that they all use for talking to each other.
What I found surprising was a) how prominent the image was on Skyās site b) how the phone / radio didnāt feature in the text of the page c) the high resolution of the image for a web site (I was able to zoom in a long way).
So why would Sky give the image that prominence and treatment but not mention it?
Itās odd.
Also, if there was anything embarrassing (for the gov or security services) about it - then I donāt think it would have been handed over in the street in front of the press.
It the press got a photo of it, then whoever was securing the scene was either not worried about it being photographed or they wanted it to be photographed.
All fair points that have to be considered, but(always a but with me) there have been untold mistakes and leaks(if you look at it as an organised and competent op), especially before the met(SS in another name) took over. You only have to look on any of the fact checker sites(look how the media story was heavily and often edited when the met stepped in).
It all stinks worse than pompey.
No less plausible than any other theory chucked out there and youāve managed to work in the added hardship suffered by the average low end millionaire.
Send them your C. V no one there has shown more aptitude.
Can you link to these fact checker sites which you claim to know. Snopes.com for starts. Also how the āmedia storyā was āheavily and often editedā?
Yes Ted i can.
Can you answer any of the previously asked questions, or is ok for you to ignore things that donāt suit your narrative?
Hereās a place for you to start. https://www.newssniffer.co.uk/articles/1561450/diff/12/13
Iād like to know youāre thoughts on this bit, once youāve answered some of the earlier questions.
The woman, who asked not to be named, told the BBC she moved Ms Skripal into the recovery position and opened her airway, as others tended to her father.
She said she treated her for almost 30 minutes, saying there was no sign of any chemical agent on Ms Skripalās face or body.
The doctor said she had been worried she would be affected by the nerve agent, but added that she āfeels fineā.
Thereās a glaring problem with that statement.
This could go in so many threads, or indeed start itās own, but here fits just as well as any.
Look at it all put together and then play the favourite fantasy headline game(thereās tons to choose from).
Iām going for this outrageous little beauty from a few years back. A true classic in the propaganda game.
Looked at your āscienceā Ted and turned out to be nothing of the sort.
My quote about the ādoctorā was taken word for word from the BBC(your Bible).
Iām bored of you and your main steam media mysticism. Like them, you have no answers to the simplest questions and you donāt like anyone else asking them.
You havenāt read Mander, have you? He describes your condition and the reasons behind it very well. Try it and donāt bore me with your pseudoscience bollocks any more.