A new poll in most of the MSM shows that less than half of people polled back Theresa Mayâs handling of the Salisbury poisoning incident. It will be a lot less than half once the full implications of the BZ disinformation sting kicks in. The Swiss Speiz lab, a centre of excellence, one of only 5 centres authorized by the OPCW, have confirmed that poison used in Salisbury was âBZ toxinâ, produced in UK US NATO, not Russia.
Lavrov said today that Russia has received the report from Speiz lab, the actual lab that performed the analysis of the samples taken from Skripol. Maybe they got it from a lab employee who was seriously pissed off with the difference between the lab report and the final OPCW report, not for me to say. Nonetheless it is clear that the final OPCW report deliberately omits a lot of things from the lab report, insisting only on the things that help the UK prove their case.
For example, a high concentration of Novichok was found in the samples, and this was gladly reiterated in the final report. There is a caveat though. The concentration of Novichok was so high that the Skripols should have been dead. In addition such a high concentration is curious in itself given the high volatility of the substance. But the lab report states something even more strange. The presence of another nerve agent, 3-Quinuclidinyl benzilate, or BZ. BZ is a non lethal toxin developed in NATO countries, but not Russia. It is actually an incapacitating nerve agent which is much more consistent with the Skripolâs symptoms than Novichok. For example, BZ is is normally a non-lethal toxin, known to kick in some hours after exposure. This may well explain how the Skripols are still alive, and how they managed to take a walk around Salisbury, go to a pub, have lunch in a restaurant then another stroll before they collapsed on a bench. Curious eh? From the symptoms and the lab report, it looks like the Skripols were exposed to BZ, and that the UK possibly manipulated the blood samples they gave to OPCW, byâoverdosingâ them with Novichok.
It will be interesting to see what happens regarding the publicâs views on this once the OPCW has to explain why the Swiss Spiez laboratory reported the presence of BZ in the sample it was given to test. And why that significant detail wasnât in the published summary. Whichever way you cut it, we are being lied to, big style. It is becoming more and more clear that these events, the Demonization of Russia over the past few years, culminating in the events in Salisbury, closely followed by the so called gassing in Syria, where we are led to believe that Assad, on the cusp of victory against the Islamic Jihadist ârebelsâ who are trying to overrun the country, does the one thing that would guarantee a military response from The West. The whole charade has clearly been choreographed, how stupid do they think we are? This has always been about regime change in Syria, and it is still about regime change in Syria, despite Mayâs bare faced lie today. The events of the last few weeks have been the last, desperate throw of the dice in NATOâs increasingly deluded attempt to achieve this. They are out of their depth.
I realise itâs not the Daily Telegraph, but does anyone seriously believe that Lavrov is just pulling this out of his arse? From the word go it is our lot who have been evasive, refusing to follow international law, refusing to answer questions etc etc. If this is true, and i donât think Lavrov is a fool, it illustrates that no doubt Porton Down told the government what it was, and explains the weasel words from their spokesman, who until recently was a head of sales for Motorola! FFS. How stupid do they think we are.
Wow. Just Wow.
