Iāve mainly be lurking since Barry left. Mostly Iāve been bored to the very depths of my soul. Iām not sure if itās because Barry has left or if itās because this time has happened to coincide with all this MĆ©gane Murkell and men are all rapists hysteria.
If you are referring to my comment about the moon landing, as the Diana thread seemed to be covering two issues, her murder and conspiracy theories in general, I was going to make a point using the reasons presented that the moon landings didnāt take place as part of my argument. I then got to the point where I thought that the thread was descending into the normal circular argument format again and life it too short frankly, so I decided to bail on that particular thread. We all believe what we want to believe for whatever reason and I doubt if anyone has changed their mind about something based on an Internet forum disagreement. The poor woman is dead and no amount of squabbling here will bring her back so Iāll leave that thread to you guys.
You seemed to bail on that thread once @Nottarf-Krap bowled your middle wicket - thatās the issue Iāve got. Youāre happy to have staunch and controversial views, with huge amounts of hyperbole and inconsistencies between posts on the same thread. You will not take anyone elseās points 9nce yourlve made your decision. Then, once someone asks something of you with a decent argument that you canāt counter, you bail.
That is why you are like Barry.
You were being fitted up for a Barry suit by some of the finest tailors in Chertsey and the Scottish wasteland.
I donāt blame you for keeping your head down.
The Chertsey branch is undiminished by your unwillingness to put on said Barry suit, so theyāve used the opportunitity to cater to that less happy, slightly older demographic.
I donāt recall being bowled mid wicket and had been wanting to bail on the thread for a while. Thing is I didnāt want to be accused of what you have just accused me of, which kind of proves my point.
As to your other point, doesnāt that apply to everyone on here, not just me? I and I am sure everybody else is willing to change their opinion if proof is provided that their opinion is wrong. As I said several times, I read a great deal about why certain people thought that Diana had been murdered but I never saw or heard anything to strongly support that claim, in fact quite the opposite, so why should I change my mind? I did say that if substantiated evidence was provided to support that claim I would be happy to change my mind. If, somehow, you can make that statement mean that I am intransigent then there is nothing else to say.
I would just ask you to go back and respond to @Nottarf-Krap post - it was a well-written post and deserves to be responded to. Iāll give you the benefit of the doubt and not say that you read it and couldnāt respond, but instead it was a coincidence that you quit at just that point.
Depends what you find entertaining I suppose, If you want edgy youāre in the wrong place, weāve got as much edge as a bollock and weāre half as interesting. What drew you here in the first place?
4 Likes
I think itās probably the bright green (default) background on his forum avatar!
Thatās probably as exciting and edgy as it gets hereā¦
1 Like
I honestly donāt know if I read it or not but certainly donāt recall being bowled? I really have no interest in getting sucked into a circular argument again. I have made it clear that I am happy to change my opinion if someone can provide firmer evidence than a statement from Mohamed Al-Fayed.
Well why donāt you go back and read it then? @Nottarf-Krap spent a lot of time typing it, the polite thing to do would be to make the effort to read it and reply to it.
Itās only a circular argument if you spend your time repeating the same thing over and over - again one of the issues we had on here with Barry.
edgy??? 
the only āedgeā is my life is the fucking thing down the side of the house that I have to cut every year
Are you mistaking āedgeā for āhedgeā? This isnāt a two ronnies sketch this is serious discourse, get your fucking act together CB weāve got people to impress!
4 Likes
Yes, I felt I was saying the same thing repeatedly, which is why I bailed on the thread. If it means so much to you I will go back and read it but I suspect that it doesnāt contain anything that contains any evidence to support the claims that she was murdered, so I am not sure how that will help me change my current opinion?
Look Cherts, you clearly have an issue with me. I am sorry that is the case and that you think that I am a liar. I am sorry that you left TSW because of me but it really wasnāt may fault that hypochondriac decided to follow me around and jump on every post I made within seconds of me posting them. It got worse when CB Fry decided to join in on the act and they became a tag team. Fortunately by that stage I decided to put both of them on ignore so I missed the worst of it but if you recall, Coxford Lou said that she thought that it was a bad case of bullying. Trust me, it really wasnāt very pleasant and I am not looking to repeat the experience here.
I will say this one last time. I have an opinion on the death of Diana based on a great number of articles and in various documentaries I have read and seen over the years. Some are official. Most are independent (I am sure you can imagine who the media here would love to prove that she was murdered, not least because it would take the heat off them). Like everyone else I have seen Al-Fayedās claim along with other claims. I have seen the reasons for those claims and I have seen responses. I have formed my own opinion based on that information. I may be wrong. I might change my mind in future if other information comes to light. I donāt know what else I can say but I do believe that you and every single other person on this forum does exactly the same every day of their lives - so why is the opinion of someone you say is a liar anyone of so much importance to you?
Errrmā¦
Ok, I have gone back and found it and yes I did read it at the time. No I didnāt consider my middle stump knocked out because it is exactly the same supposition that the conspiracies are based on. Where is the evidence? Where are all these people who claim that she was pregnant and was going to marry Dodi? Names? Iām sorry but all of this stuff has already been discounted through lack of evidence. This is why I was going to bring up the moon landings and the āevidenceā given that was so easily debunked. James Hewitt is alive and well and is making a living as a gardener. There was an article about him not so long ago. There was an article about Trevor Rees-Jones in the Express on 30th August 2017 talking about his life after the accident. I assume that he is still alive and getting on with his life. Seriously, all of this other stuff has been dealt with and does not provide evidence that she was murdered. So no āowzatā Iām afraid.
Post being checked by VARā¦
3 Likes
Lets nip this one in the bud nowā¦ , Di liked cock, which pissed off the establishment that only allow their men to sow wild oats and not their women to like cockā¦ So lets look at the evidenceā¦She was in Paris, which according to many women is THE place to go for cock, french cock being attached to french men who are rumoured to be better users of their cock than establishment British āmenā. This could not be let to pass, so its clear as mustard, and as obvious as a VAR decision that establishment cocks sent over black ops cocks (wet cocks) to takeout the cock lover and make it look like a premature ejaculationā¦ Its a cock conspiracy tell you.
3 Likes
Pity she didnāt stick to Cock au Vin instead of Cock au Mercedes. 
2 Likes