beltch’s first boner since OED 2nd edition and I was there to see it!
Originally posted by @Coxford_lou
Originally posted by @saintbletch
Lou’s boobs are lovely.
Just the right size, and, erm, weight, I imagine, well if I’d imagined about Lou’s boobs, then I imagine that I’d imagine they were just the right weight.
Sorry Louise. This is all a bit unseemly, but I’m trying to protect your honour.
Fckn peodo.
Thank fuck you didn’t spell that correctly, or I’d have a shitload more work to do.
Calling someone a “peodo” is perfectly acceptable given that it’s not a recognised word.
Were you feeding him the viagra? And should you admit to seeing it, really?
Is it as small as they all say it is?
Originally posted by @saintbletch
Originally posted by @Coxford_lou
Originally posted by @saintbletch
Lou’s boobs are lovely.
Just the right size, and, erm, weight, I imagine, well if I’d imagined about Lou’s boobs, then I imagine that I’d imagine they were just the right weight.
Sorry Louise. This is all a bit unseemly, but I’m trying to protect your honour.
Fckn peodo.
Thank fuck you didn’t spell that correctly, or I’d have a shitload more work to do.
Damn! I thought it didn’t look right, but didn’t want to google it to check.
If only you put this much thinking into setting out the rules clearly. We know where your loyalties lie
Has pap asked you to fill in as the spellcheker until he gets time to code one?
It is interesting though that calling someone a peodophile is considered completely socially unacceptable in a male dominated football forum where supposedly everything goes.
Thought for the day.
Interesting.
fkn piedos touchgn smal chiltern on thrie bhumoles fkn greasin theri nippers up with buter
wait… that looks like I’m masturbating.
Damn you and your female logic…
Aren’t you?
Interesting point Lou.
Perhaps there are questions over why calling someone a paedo is unacceptable but continually calling someone a cunt and threatening them with violence is deemed okay.
I’d suggest both are out of order, but I’m not the one measuring people up for orange boiler suits…and lingering just too long over the inside leg measurements.
Oh, so that’s what you were doing. I did wonder, but I didn’t like to ask.
Where I grew up (Coxford) people would be slinging that insult around all the time. I hate the term because of the witch hunt mentality it whips up, which I guess is the opposite response to the offence taken on here by it. But as a joke it’s way more ridiculous and therefore non-offensive, than calling someone a term that feels more grounded in reality. Playground insults.
Calling someone paedophile is ok, that is just normal Banter, but Sarb went bit further. Sarb started describing Barry’s fiddlings in detail, and this created mental images in people’s mind, which made them uncomfortable feeling in their pants, so they was Angar.
Same as i.e. referring to Lou’s boobs in the third person is fine, but when beltch starts describing the size and weight etc you can’t help but start touching yourself, which is bit awkward at work.
If a newcomer were to visit Sotonians and see Barry described as a peado they may think it’s true and an injustice would have been done and reputations ruined. If they saw him described as a cunt then…
Or at Jungle Jim’s.
Yikes, I must have missed that. Lol.
Yeah, Bletch’s description did have that effect on me, but I’m at home, so it wasn’t a problem.
I can guarantee that this post has just had exactly the same impact on 99.6% of our membership - at work or not.
Perhaps I’m projecting?
I’ll have to stay seated just in case.
Remember when bear confessed to being a paedo in the early days and psp went mad? He was PMing me all like “what if a visitor came on the site and found one of our best posters ™ was a paedo? How would they react?” I was up for finding out but Pap deleted the threads and then forced me to give a false confession that it was me using bear’s login (password = alldembitches)!
That would be worth a guesting under the new rules.