I did read it and I am not discounting it. #Pizzagate didnât start when it came to the attention of the news, itâs been going on for a LONG time.
I have based my beliefs on 20 years of being labels a âconspiracy theoristâ.
If you still believe Russia âpossibly infiltratedâ and âmeddled in the outcomeâ of the 217 election, thatâs cool, I have my understanding of world events that do seem to be poles apart to most on here.
Still not understanding your dismissal because the words pizza shop appear. Are we to discount the possibility of abduction from pizza shops because of a previous lie?
Again not saying itâs true, but no one has come up with any reason to doubt it, whilst all doubting it. Strange thinking.
Thatâs the fun of being a âtheoristâ. I try to look at anything the MSM is telling the populace and instead of saying âwell, itâs from the media so it must be true!â, I do do due diligence based firstly on my beliefs and moral compass, then I do research of not so MSM news sites and come to a balanced opinion.
Yes, I do believe the word âpizzaâ is key in this story no matter who was the guilty party towards the child. Let me ask you this, if it âwasâ Trump, how did she get to be in the same room as him? We seem to not be considering the Abductors in this whole situation. Who were they, what were their motives? How did she end up with Trump? Was she delivered to his door? Was it on Epsteinâs Island?
My honest hope is you have a look into these questions and you may then have the opportunity to develop a new perspective on it, you may not. At least you can say you would know more about the topic which can only do you good
"Trumpâs association with Mafia bosses resulted from intermediary services provided by the infamous mobbed-up lawyer Roy Cohn (shown at left), someone also known for his prurient sexual interests involving young men. Cohn, who represented leaders in both the Genovese and Gambino mobs, died in 1986 from complications from AIDS. Before that, however, as Trumpâs business attorney, friend and mentor, Cohn made the right âintroductionsâ for Trump in the organized crime underground of the New York City area, including Connecticut.
It is very likely that Trumpâs focus on girls and young women involved compromising him with âfavorsâ that were provided by mob elements in New York and elsewhere, such as Waterbury. And, considering Waterburyâs current obfuscation on providing official information on Mariaâs abduction and Giordanoâs mob ties and pedophile problems, concerned citizens might reasonably demand answers regarding basic information about the kidnapped girl â as well as how those secrets relate to the cityâs troubled past and current politics."
The article gives potential answers to all your other above questions, including witness statements.
Can you show any reason to dismiss the whole thing because of what the place of abduction is called, or any other dubious mention of pizza shop before 1993? Sorry iâm still not getting why it should be so easily dismissed when you consider the evidence available.
Firstly, did you read the image above? Whatâs your take on that? Could be complete and utter bollocks but so could the story you are quoting.
Is it completely unfathomable that those witnesses are pawns in the game? On the take too? Might sound absurd but lets throw it in to the mixer.
The whole âbefore 1993â question comes down to your thoughts/beliefs on how long do you think this whole shenanigans has been going on? Do you believe childrenâs involvement in this underbelly has just started? I personally believe it has been going on for aeons.
Itâs just one of the thousands of groups that work for a certain agenda, which seems to happen everywhere and on all sides.
Not unfathomable, but there are a lot of them and their statements are consistent. For now they have to be given the benefit of the doubt.
This is where i get confused. Of course itâs been going on for aeons, but how does that dismiss it happening outside a pizza shop? This abduction case is real, although what happened after the abduction is open to question.
Maybe we were both confused. Iâm not trying to dismiss it and I think we are on the same page here.
It probably did happen outside of a pizza shop, that I am not debating. I was wondering, out loud perhaps, how Donald gets inserted into every article at the minute with negative connotations but if it wasnât him why the real perpetrators arenât brought to fair and equitable justice.
This isnât a new article, so not something thatâs been written to suit the present agenda. I was following links from something else, came across it and found it disturbing that so much seems to have been hushed up.
Whoever done what needs full and open investigation. Anything less is a problem.
Check out some of the comments on this article. Quite a few seem to think it is ok to have sex with / lust over under age girls. That, you know, theyâre fertile girls and itâs just normal. Totally ok for a rich white guy (and maybe some of those commenting)?
I do wonder who his paymasters were. Big mates with Ghislane Maxwell, whose father was a Mossad agent. Thatâs a lot of compromising material that a certain political lobby might use for influence.
Apparently ghislaine maxwell has disappeared, reliably reported to be in Israel. She will be protected there. No way will they allow her to be questioned by the fbi or anyone else, just imagine if she spilled her guts as part of a plea bargain. Not that it would ever be allowed to happen, she would go the same way as epstein. The way he was dealt with, in plain sight, sends a powerful message to anyone else thinking of trying to save their neck by co operating. Letâs face it, she has the goods on a lot of very powerful people, from British royals through to ex prime ministers, presidents, and assorted billionaires. They are a mafia, and the usual rules apply. We will never find out the half of it.