:gov: Boris Johnson is Still the Prime Minister

But David Lammy is a twat!

1 Like

Calling out a xenophobic white racist?

He has made some ridiculous sweeping statements in the past.

Doesn’t endear him to people.

Which one did you call out in your original post?

Kwasi Kwarteng is a fucking gammon if ever I’ve seen one.

2 Likes

And I told you pre-Brexit that by 2020 Boris would be PM if Corbin was voted in as leader of the opposition.

And you were right, although I suspect for reasons entirely different from those you’d considered.

Yup. Boris Johnson was supposed to become PM in 2016… Better late than never, @WorzelScummage.

I seem to remember also being told that in no way would he become PM because of the might of Corbin and his followers…

Ok Pap, I’ll bite. This is my original post. What part of this is racist? It is referring, as you know, to Johnson’s affair with Jennifer Arcuri. It simply refers to Daily Mail readers and their reaction to the latest revelations about the Arcuri affair. How you have managed to turn this into something about racism only you will know.

As I thought. You weren’t singling out any one person. Just an imagined horde of people you don’t like and a massive fucking generalisation.

Carry on. Keep “calling it out”!

1 Like

If you had read the hundreds of replies in the thread then perhaps you wouldn’t see it as a “massive generalisation”. Mail readers is used as a collective noun for good reason and yes, I am happy to keep calling them out for their archaic attitudes. It just seems odd that someone with left wing sensibilities gets upset about it.

Maybe sweeping generalisations are the way forward? The dopamine hit from giving it large to imaginary groups of people in online forums has got to be good for our mental health. I’m coming around to SOG’s way of thinking that all Mail readers are racist shouty gammony cunts, particularly my 80 year old neighbour who “takes” the DM every day. The few times she looked after my nipper when i was late, the cakes she’s baked for us and the generally nice neighbourly attitude count for fuck all now. And i’m convinced the fact she’s never had a bad word for anyone, irrespective of race and religion don’t fool me. After all she voted the Leave the EU and that, along with the DM, is bad enough to put her in the category of xenophobic, racist bastard. She probably even voted Tory, FFS. I’ve been living next to a nazi all this time.

1 Like

Why on Earth would I do that?

Why on Earth would you do that?

Why would I do what? Call people out for xenophobic/racist attitudes? You called me out for calling a certain type of person a “gammon”. Why would you do that? Are you saying that you have never used a generalisation?

Why would you:-

a) Go to the Daily Mail website
b) Spend ages reading their comments

Doesn’t sound like a particularly fruitful endeavour.

Sweeping generalisations maybe lazy, but they also save a lot of time. Why use 10 words when you can use one or two? I think that we all understand that not all Daily Mail readers are right wing, small minded xenophobes, but enough are to make the comparison worth while. We all know what people mean when they use the words “gammon”, “snowflake”, “leftie” etc. We all use lazy abbreviations, even the affronted Pap. It is just on this occasion he has decided to take a comment about the reaction to Boris Johnson’s relationship with Jennifer Arcuri and turn it into a discussion about Brexit.

Because I had read their article about Johnson/Arcuri and the comments section followed on, so I continued reading. It was fruitful in the sense that it confirmed what I thought about the thought process of a section of their readership.It would be a very ill informed world if people only ever read or listened to things that represented their point of view would it not?

You are all cunts

That ought to cover it

4 Likes

Why use 10 words when you can use one or two?

Because it may save time typing a dozen replies trying to justify it? :thinking: