Very quick answer. You introduced the conspiracy angle. You explain it.
1 Like
Very quickly, I don’t believe that there was a conspiracy therefore I don’t see the need to explain something that I don’t believe in.
As for the comments about skin tone, very surprised to hear that it wasn’t Philip as it is something you can imagine going through his head and as we know he has no filter. My second bet is now on Andrew.
Apparently not. Clarified that it was neither Philip nor the Queen.
I am with you on this @pap.
You do not have to be a conspiracy nutcase to have “concerns” “be uneasy with” “have a tinkling in your water” with regard to the death of Diana.
Equally, the photos of Will & Harry can put the same “Roger Moore raised eyebrow” into ones mind.
And I do not believe any human being that watched Diana’s funeral found it anything but “stressful” watching those poor kids walk behind the hearse.
And I’ve never watched an episode of The Crown.
Well Harry has said it wasn’t Philip or the Queen and although Charles is a bit of a duffer I don’t think he would say something like that.
But why? Any damage that she was likely to do had already been done. To be honest Charles and Andrew have been just as much a liability to the RF reputation as Diana. Should Megan be worried about being on a hit list now?
Then why raise it?
I think you need to decide which side of the fence you want on this one. My initial response to you on this was in reply to you saying that if they thought they were targets then, they’ll be even bigger targets now.
So it comes back to “which Royal family are we talking about?”.
Your own words suggest there will be consequences involved. So how are they going to do that?
Will it all just happen by accident, like in the plane scene in Raiders of the Lost Ark, or will they have a chat about it behind closed doors? Y’know, conspire.
Because it is nonsense. You raised the issue about the time it took for the ambulance to reach the hospital but if you had read the debunking of the conspiracy theories, which I assume you have, you will see that everything is accounted for.
You are the one making an issue of Diana and questioning her death, not me.
That’s exactly what they want you to think.
2 Likes
I see. The old double bluff! Frankly I think that they went for the wrong one. Fergie was a better target.
1 Like
Surely that’s the one thing you would be able to agree with, regardless of anything else. She had just done the Bashir interview, plus she was being publicly courted by Al Fayed (and reportedly close to marrying him, although that doesn’t make a huge difference.) I can’t believe you genuinely don’t see any reason for the Firm to fervently wish she was out of the picture completely.
1 Like
It really did take 90 minutes to get her to a hospital. Claimed nowt else. Now if you don’t think that’s dubious in a capital city with a VIP late at night, I have some stunning waterfront property in London that may interest you.
I don’t want to say Tower Bridge out loud, but it’s Tower Bridge 
3 Likes
I didn’t say it didn’t, just that the time was accounted for.
Apparently the rumours about the marriage as were those about her being pregnant were completely untrue and peddled by his father for his own reasons. She was in a relationship with someone for 2 years of a different religion and there had been discussion about marriage and the RF apparently didn’t have a problem with it. She did an interview about the failure of her marriage. Is that a reason to kill someone? Charles had already said he wanted to be a tampon so he could be closer to Camilla. Surely that was more embarrassing for the RF.
OK conspiracy thread then
Not doing that either. I reject the introduction of the term in the first place.
1 Like
“The rumours about marriage and being pregnant were completely untrue and were peddled by his father”. You know this how?
1 Like
Oh yes, that’s all there was to it alright. I’m sure the Firm won’t have looked askance on that interview at all. 
