Of course,
You think its more probable the Ukrainians fired a missle than the Russians? I donât, when did the Ukrainian missle BUK theory start? Straight away or later?
Of course,
You think its more probable the Ukrainians fired a missle than the Russians? I donât, when did the Ukrainian missle BUK theory start? Straight away or later?
And as for you 13/52 25%, that would only be on the first occasion.
Look them all up, then come back and admit you were taken in again, unless itâs your job. Whatâs your cluster called?
Iâll give you a bit of help, but just because itâs the BBC. Contact them and ask why the BBC Russian Service on July 23, 2014(report by Olga Ivshina) was taken down and even though they apologised, they refuse to put it back up.
If you check all the points out, iâll even show you deleted bbc report.
Oh and hereâs a BUK launching, that no one seen.
Probability?
Hand this over to the Australians, Dutch and Malaysians now, Iâm sure they havenât seen this and they wonât decide to continue to think, believe its correct to pursue the Russia line of enquiryâŚ
They have already seen it. Look up the veto given to the prime suspect that has a history and changed MH-17s flight path and altitude, but no other planes. Itâs really important you know what that says.
You of course will stick with your blind religious faith(now you canât even attempt to use probability).
I guess so and neither can the Australians, Dutch and Malaysians, they should had used a blag website to help them clear this upâŚ
What like the BBC?
You avoid all points raised, as usual. Your whole argument is based on no more than, they are Russia, so guilty.
Read the veto given to the number 1 suspect and then come back and explain how thatâs normal in your ever changing alter reality.
Your fervent belief and dismissal of all evidence is truly biblical.
Iâm asking for proof, you canât provide any as usual, your boorish anti western crap is tiresome, why donât you move there? You hate it here, I couldnât abide living somewhere I donât fit in or hated.
Itâs all there and you more than anyone needs the education, so look it up.
I will go through it one point at a time.
Do you consider it fair and normal for the prime suspect in a mass murder to get a veto over all evidence, including the other partaking nations never being allowed to divulge anything the prime suspect doesnât want known. Yes or no?
Simple enough for you, i hope.
So they took a single poll that favoured their masters?
They are blatant, which is probably the answer to this question.
Looked at as the article does, you have to question the role they play in the supply of (mis)informing public perception.
Thread detailing how 50+ Russiagate stories have had to be taken down or corrected as they proved to be bullshit:
https://twitter.com/Jonathan_K_Cook/status/1086975519327965187
And the Russians donât build narratives of denialâŚ
If you say so.
RT for one, its not news its a Russian point of view, hence no pro democracy things on there, pro human rights, anti invasion demos, pension protests etc etc.
From the RT UK website:
âRT UK broadcasts from our London Studio, focusing on the issues that matter most to Britons. We bring a totally different perspective to mainstream British television â in line with RTâs core mission to Question More.â
Then you have the English language RT out of Moscow
âRTâs flagship, award-winning English-language channel airs 24/7 from the networkâs Moscow offices and is available to more than 700 million viewers worldwide. It covers the most urgent domestic and international issues of our time for viewers wishing to question more and delivers stories often missed by the mainstream media to create news with an edge. RT provides an alternative perspective on major global events, and acquaints an international audience with the Russian viewpoint.â
I think theyâre upfront about what they do. Donât have a problem with it. Theyâre just one source of information.
Its a viewpoint nothing more, a Russian viewpoint as well, with the aim of advancing Russia interests, again nothing more.
If you see that for what it is then great, but donât expect to see anything like we have in the West, condemnation of human rights, free questioning press, a belief in equality etc etc
Do you see the BBC for the propaganda spreading government and SS mouth piece that it is?
Itâs no different from RT(although more factually incorrect).
I see the BBC genuinely as the most unbiased of all large mainstream media, if the left and right both bitch about bias then you know theyâre doing something right, they get things wrong of course they do, what and who doesnât?
RT and Sputnik go all the way back to the Kremlin and in turn Putin, the BBC isnât like that, youâd like to think it is but it isnât.
Keep up the blind faith, despite all the evidence.
It couldnât work without people like you.