Doesn’t matter which side your on, your being played.
"Trump, of course, is an authoritarian through and through, organizing a fascistic attack on immigrant workers and developing tools that will be used against the entire working class.
However, his opponents, utilizing of the methods of the palace coup—intrigues, leaks, media smears, special prosecutors and other provocations—are no more wedded to democratic forms than Trump. The essence of the drive to censor the internet, spearheaded by the Democratic Party, is revealed by the JP Morgan report: it is the platform for “social groups,” above all, the working class, “to become more self-aware.”
Trump is not the worry, the worry should be what follows.
The guardian chuck out a balanced article just to confuse me. Some truth in this bit and it’s our media leads that leads the way, which then rubs off on all of us.
"But it is a weakness of our time that we insist (completely contrary to reality) that a person is either good or bad, or to be supported or opposed. I think it is a positive thing that we complexify moral judgment.”
I still think, if things continue like this, it’s what comes next, rather than trump himself, that’s the real concern. He may prove to be no more than a useful idiot. Then again, if he reduces American foreign aggression, he’ll be more deserving of a Nobel peace prize than any other President before him.
What a strange world we live in🤔
I think the update brings in to question who he thinks is responsible for the article as the journalist mysteriously retired on the same day as publication.
Isn’t he complaining about Stephanie Kirchgaessner, Dan Collyns and Luke Harding, as the authors of the fairytale he linked?
I don’t think it would be hard to win that case.
Going by his personality traits and also verified by some commentators, this speech in 2011 may have tipped him over the edge. As well as Roger Stone and his Russian debts.
