:tories: Tories in trouble?

:tories: Tories in trouble?
0

#3273

#3274

#3275

#3276

oops


#3277

Jeez
If thus was a Brian Rix farce it would be derided as over the top, but real life?
Dear Lord what a clvsterfvck


#3278

Who the hell is advising May? She has to go . She has zero credibility.

She should have done the vote - lost it and then gone back to the EU and said, I told you they would shit can it - but she has burn that bridge over the week end.

She is hapless


#3279

It’s ok to quote the words, as they are attributed to a person and there is a record of what was said. So, it’s believable.
It’s not so good quoting any media and stating it as indesputable, purely because of the publication. This would be especially true if they have been shown to deliberately make shit up.
If it’s from Mark Urban(bbc), Luke Harding(guardian), or Elliott Higgins(bellendcat),then you’d have to be simple to entertain it. Proven liars, one and all.
Do you believe all the words of Al Pfeffel as well?


#3280

Perhaps a more important question is why she is so unsure of her own qualities and counsel. As I’ve said before, I don’t think she planned any further than getting into Number 10.

Her best days were when Nick Timothy and Fiona Hill were running things for her, but according to Tim Shipman, author of Fall Out, they were a pair of bullies that managed to alienate much of the rest of the cabinet, showing complete contempt for the Chancellor. These were her best days, remember, and those days resulted in the disastrous general election, the loss of her two advisers as sacrificial scapegoats. The Brexit process was commandeered by a not very keen civil service. We see their not very keen results.

Ultimately though, the fault is hers. She is perhaps the most powerful personification of the old adage, “be careful what you wish for”.


#3281

#3282

It was a valid question, you’re quoting who you believe, we’ve been over this, you’re on the wrong planet if you are looking for one truth, no such thing.


#3283

It’s not valid, it’s your usual game. Projection.
You quote, from a very narrow field. I try taking a wider view.
We have been over this multiple times and i’m not the one that believes the “one truth” of the SS/government mouth pieces, who’s words you accept without question, everytime(no matter how often they are shown as liars).
What’s this thread called. Who’s allowed to quote from where, according to the gospel of Sanchez?
Talk about the subject, not the poster.


#3284

#3285

Its perfectly valid, you merely quote things you accept regardless of source, human nature, don’t be ashamed.


#3286

#3287

No, it’s not.
Now stick to the subject. What is wrong with the quote and why do you believe yourself to be the arbiter of who’s allowed to quote from where?
Your constant projection is dull and will be ignored.


#3288

Fuck me has she changed her mind again? :lou_lol: .


#3289

Keep on quoting (as long as it agrees with your narrative) in the free World.


#3290

Projection again. Can you do anything else? Maybe something on topic even.


#3291

Just following RT’s narrative, surely you can relate to projection?


#3292

Of course i can. I read your posts, don’t I?
Don’t watch RT so no idea what you are talking about(just like yourself), but do enlighten us about their narrative(maybe on the correct thread).
Still waiting for you to explain why i can’t post confirmed statements on the relevant thread. Anyone would think you are deliberately trying to steer the conversation away from that subject. Understandable, if you back such anti democratic malevolence and propaganda. Do you?