🇺🇦 The War/Invasion in/of Ukraine

[Not_Barry]

Interesting piece of what a Russian speaker was and now is.

The city stopping Russia from taking south Ukraine

[scotty]

@pap

War is hell.

Hell is other people.

Sartre.

[Cobham-Saint]

@Not_Barry

One can only hope the “illness” that racks Putin catches up with him soon enough.

Speculation, but yes, if true. Plenty of armchair medical expert out there in the media.

[Not_Barry]

Let’s hope they’re right and his demise is quick, peace has a chance then.

[pap]

Be careful what you wish for. There are bigger hardliners than Putin in Russia that criticise him for being soft.

[Not_Barry]

I wish he was gone, a fascist little cunt if ever there was one, the bloated twat will hopefully succumb soon I hope, and I don’t think I’ve ever wished that on anyone before.

[pap]

I will take your comments into all due consideration*.

* Suce consideration including the fact I suspect you don’t know the meaning of the term “fascist”

I think we all too quickly forget which pond Putin emerged from. He was Yeltsin’s Western-approved man, in a context where Communist hardliners had tried to overthrow the government.

I really think that you need to think about how it is that you can get so animated about this.

You’ve admitted, to the whole world, that you’re sitting there wasting brain cycles on wanting Putin dead from an illness that he may or may not have.

It’s utterly irrational.

[Not_Barry]

Pap, Putin ticks all the boxes for a fascist.

Definition of FASCISM

He’s annexed, invaded, he is an autocrat.

You tell me from that official definition where Putin isn’t like that, I know it doesn’t fit your narrative and agenda but I’ll go with an official meaning of the word and not your elastic term of it.

*You got shown your arse the other day concerning the many usages and meanings of the word nationalism, I suggest whilst looking at the old Oxford you look this word up as well.

[Nottarf-Krap]

You very loftily proclaim that you fail to recognise invaders, which is fair enough. Interesting though that you obviously don’t recognise the UK and the USA. Or are you selective about which invaders you don’t recognise?

[Cobham-Saint]

@Nottarf-Krap

You very loftily proclaim that you fail to recognise invaders, which is fair enough. Interesting though that you obviously don’t recognise the UK and the USA. Or are you selective about which invaders you don’t recognise?

But obviously they’re our invaders not Johnny Foreigner so that’s OK

[scotty]

@Cobham-Saint

But obviously they’re our invaders not Johnny Foreigner so that’s OK

“One man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter”.

[Not_Barry]

Why am I selective? And selective on what? And how do you know that?

Read those questions and then you’ll realise you really shouldn’t use equivalence and whataboutery.

I’ll help you, Blair and Bush should be in the Hague and they’re cunts but what that has to do with anything fuck knows.

[Not_Barry]

Can you further this to show apparent bigotry? I’d like to think you’re not a bigot.

[Cobham-Saint]

@Not_Barry

Can you further this to show apparent bigotry? I’d like to think you’re not a bigot.

What the fuck are you talking about? Your post makes absolutely no sense.

Do you understand humour or lighthearted banter or are you just trigger-happy taking offense and being offensive yourself?

[Nottarf-Krap]

And I’ll help you Barry. The USA and the UK launched an illegal invasion on Iraq, in recent history, this is an indisputable fact. This invasion resulted in the deaths of countless thousands, probably over a million of innocent civilians dying a horrible death. Hundreds of thousands left maimed with life changing injuries, babies still being born today with deformities due to the deployment of depleted uranium, (a war crime). Now you proudly proclaim that you don’t recognise invaders. Do you recognise the USA and the UK? Its not difficult is it. If you do recognise them then your statement that you don’t recognise invaders is clearly hypocritical bollocks.

[BTripz]

To be fair to Barry he has said that Bush and Blair should be in the Hague being tried for war crimes. But on a point of semantics, Iraq wasn’t invaded it was “Liberated”

[Nottarf-Krap]

I’m sorry, never mind the virtue signalling get out clause that Bush and Blair should be in The Hague, Barry proudly boasted that he doesn’t recognise invaders. It’s difficult to avoid the conclusion that he doesn’t recognise invaders, unless it’s his side that’s doing the invading, and the victims of our invading are Muslims who ‘aren’t like us’, not Caucasian Europeans. I’m sure we can all remember Barry’s brother’s interesting views on Muslims, I believe it’s one of the reasons he was banned. Perhaps Barry doesn’t share his brother’s views, maybe he can enlighten us.

[Not_Barry]

Enlighten us all. ask a question and it will be answered. If you want a history lesson on Muslims as then lets go, I can talk about that but don’t smear and don’t write about things you plainly don’t know about.
I’ll help you again, look at the demographics of Grozny. And I can mention others places, Balkan War.
What were Barry’s interesting views on Muslims?

Please tell us all as I’d like to know,.

[Not_Barry]

No, I don’t, are you stupid or thick blooded, they were illegal wars you mutant.

[Nottarf-Krap]

Oh dear, temper temper! It was an illegal invasion, spin it how you like, that’s what it was. Slaughtering countless thousands, targetting and deliberately destroying vital infrastructure, (a war crime), then occupying. It was an invasion. I’m not interested in your deflections about the demographics of Grozny and history lessons, it’s quite simple, you say you don’t recognize invaders, yes or no? Or do you just refuse to recognise some invaders.