The profanity filter, and how it will work

There are other reasons to do it that aren’t Chapel Kate related. People will need to be logged in to see unfiltered content, which should mean more actual people being online.

Bosses that work out you’ve been posting on Sotonians won’t be able to say “a-ha, you called @cobham-saint a cheesecunt on Sotonians” the other day (much as it may have been merited).

1 Like

Fucking cunty arse biscuits…

3 Likes

And when does this cunting censorship begin O Spawn of Mary Whitehouse?

1 Like

Put your trust in a second rate web developer. I have some nice ideas.

I bet Chapel Kate is at home now, frotting herself into delerium whilst watching anal nuns 6 on the interweb, laughing about how she’s ruined papsweb.

Shitbag.

10 Likes

On a more serious note… its sort of sensorship - some folks can chose not to read or see what i write… which means it can lose its meaning, context, humour etc. I appreciate that its not everyones cup of tea and I dont ever want to force folks to listen to things they they dont like, but that is why there are other forums that cater for their needs… AsI used to shout in frustration at Mary Whitehouse, if you dont like it, turn the fucker off!! Swearing is like Porn… The Daily Mail may suggest its offensive, but its not. Its just that some people find it offensive and that is quite different…

3 Likes

I’ll probably have it done by next weekend.

I take it sir will want his filters switched off?

Oi! @pap …Cheesecunt? Me?

Fair point, well made…

1 Like

Link to anal nuns 6 please…

You’re just thinking of one potential application.

They could equally opt to change every instance of teh to _the _- it’ll be that flexible :lou_sunglasses:

Yeah but if you did taht, tihs place would loes os mhuc

4 Likes

haha 'cheese

', that’s a good one I’m laughing my off to that one pap, don’t know why all these are getting their knickers in a bunch.

11 Likes

Does that make this Image result for asterix and obelix fatso?

2 Likes

The fucking Gaul of them, @gavstar

6 Likes

Really ???

As long as you substitute Image result for david Cameron for CUNT , I suppose it might work?

Help me out, @steveintheforest

Which bit(s) of the proposal or rationale do you disagree with?

The custom sets will let Sotonians define their own swaps. I probably will keep it plain text though. Soz.

To reiterate, you can all run completely unfiltered and that is my expectation.

Have faith, fair Chutters. I’ve got some subversive plans for this one. This will not be a standard filter.

First they come for the swearing, it’ll be £5 subscriptions next.

Then everyone will become whiny twats and the cycle begins again…

3 Likes

This

3 Likes