Probably worth pointing out that there are an estimated 30 - 50 extradition requests from Russia, for offences ranging from fraud, murder, rape, embezzlement of State funds, theft of millions in state assets, etc etc. The UK refuses to comply with these requests. So itâs hardly surprising that Russia wonât entertain extraditing the so called âSalisbury 2â. Of course if our lot extradited some of the fraudsters and embezzlers presumably they would have to give the millions they received in âdonationsâ back!
160,000 quid for a game of tennis with BoJo anyone!
But thatâs the point, youâre assuming we have no more evidence because weâve not presented it, yet you believe Turkey do even though they havenât presented it.
I wonder if youâd feel any differently if comrade Corbyn had links to the Saudis in the same way he does the Russians. It seems that people on here are liking to overlook Russiaâs appalling conduct over the last 10 years for their own agendaâs.
Russianâs canât be extradited from Russia - hence probably why - what would be the point if we werenât going to get anything back.
In addition to that, I would think protecting the lives of those people - with the likely way theyâd be dealt with in Russia - is more important.
Saudi have admitted the killing so there is more likely to be evidence no?
1 Like
They said there was a fight and he was killed, not the way the Turkâs are claimingâŚ
They are dealing with Saudi. First there will be some $100m investment discussions, then there will be some agreements about the Kurdish section of Syria & Idlib to agree as a fee fr NOT releasing the evidence.
#getreal
1 Like
Russia has consistently said letâs see the evidence. Canât see Saudi saying that can you?
2 Likes
What links?
Sounds interesting, tell us.
So, letâs try this again.
I asked you which country you thought is above Russia in the âwhodunnitâ stakes, as you said Russia is not at the top of your list. Hence you must have someone else in mind that has more evidence (hard or circumstantial) currently lodged against it. So, who is it?
Apparently they have requested it actually, as the Saudiâs are going to have make some pretty massive concessions to the Turks.
So it was more bollocks then. Unsurprising.
If the ushanka fitsâŚ
So, letâs try this again.
I asked you which country you thought is above Russia in the âwhodunnitâ stakes, as you said Russia is not at the top of your list. Hence you must have someone else in mind that has more evidence (hard or circumstantial) currently lodged against it. So, who is it?
And i asked you to address some issues, but you couldnât(some shit about question marks). When you do, i will.
Are you admitting you lied about Corbyn?(yes, a question mark, to save your confusion).
And I asked you to ask the questions again - I couldnât understand what your questions were. I answered the ones I could work out. Just ask me the questions and Iâll have a go at answering them. You obviously have no confidence in your questions if you wonât repeat them.
So, letâs try this again.
I asked you which country you thought is above Russia in the âwhodunnitâ stakes, as you said Russia is not at the top of your list. Hence you must have someone else in mind that has more evidence (hard or circumstantial) currently lodged against it. So, who is it?
It was tongue in cheek you utter Kremlin.
Couldnât understand. Really?
Back to school for you.
Yep.
Why donât you ask them again in a concise manner that someone like me would understand then?
And now theyâre guessing with no evidenceâŚ
But thatâs fine, one rule for one etc, etc.
You are correct. It can only be called evidence once itâs seen, so anyone that refuses to show the evidence they claim to have, should be considered a liar until they do.
Saudi have admitted killing him, so there will be evidence somewhere of this claim, if true. Despite what bullshit tv programmes tell you, acid will not dissolve a body completely.