Indeed. Itâs not just Bazzaâs tin-foil hatters who should beware their sources:
Itâll be interesting to see Russiaâs response to this before we start smashing Bellingcat in the mouth.
BTW, I wouldnât be surprised if either of the men are found dead in the not too distant future, with a note outlining that the pressure of the case has caused them issues. This is Russia after all.
Having followed bellingcatâs Syria âcoverageâ I find it highly amusing that these ârevelationsâ are all over the msm. One bloke sat in his pants in his bedsit dominating the front pages. Fair play to the cunt.
Sorry Cherts, but Bellingcat and anyone that uses him without verification, is not to be believed, even though the Atlantic Council sponsor him(they have an agenda).
âthis is Russia after allâ?
Propaganda works, i see. Iâd be more worried, if i was Russian, of being in this country. They donât seem to mysteriously die anywhere else.
This made me laugh, itâs like they are shoving it in your face.
Ok, so you donât believe that Putin has people killed that could cause him any sort of issues? Political rivals for example?
Donât know. Possibly. Although i would imagine that like our lot, it goes through lots of layers, so there is always plausible deniability.
Strange direction for a conversation about bellingcat to take. Why are you so sure he has?
Well, you replied saying propoganda works after I commented âThis is Russia after allâ.
These blokes have caused Putin issues, even if the original orders came (indirectly) from him.
Yes, because your sentence confirmed it.
Why have they caused Putin issues? He might be laughing his head off at the stupidly of it all. Who really knows what he thinks, or what evidence the Russians might have.
Orders(indirectly)? From May?
For completeness, here you go:
He could phone SOS up personally and he still wouldnât have it, tin foilers are not like normal people, they see a UK conspiracy in everything, long queue in Tesco, thatâll be the Government, toilet out of shit roll, MI5 have stolen it, bird staying in back garden for lengthy periods, thats the spy bird controlled from Cheltenham, theyâre batshit crazy.
1 Like
Problem with the BBC report(unlike others), it didnât quote any of the people that said no.
Problem with that kind of reporting, is obvious bias.
Problem with some people, is they are willing to believe anything.
I wonât bother with all the problems of the lies and ever changing story.
If you really want to consider the problems, start with May claiming it could only have come from Russia.
I hope the source is ok for you.
Another bullshit propaganda piece by the idiot Harding, where his fellow liar claims to know that Skripal didnât believe it was Russia that poisoned him(obviously smarter than those two), even though he hasnât seen him since last year. Look how much has become fact without any proof. Youâd have to be a halfwit to believe this drivel.
Sergei Skripal initially did not believe Russia tried to kill him â book
Its quite logical to assume Russia would assassinate a traitor as theyâve done it before, two Russians in the area on false passports also gives it high value, far higher than the shite you post on here to try and validate a wacky theory to further your Anti British agenda.
Is it? Explain the logic and provide proof theyâve done it before.
Any evidence they were on false passports(apart from the the bellendcat rubbish?
High value? Youâve been reading to much propaganda.
Have you not followed the ever changing fairytale? Nothing more wacky than the government theory(and thatâs all it is, as thereâs no proof provided). Personal insults just show the weakness of your argument. Do try harder.
Has Mayâs statement to parliament being shown to be true or false? The answer is provable.
Explain what they were doing there?
Are they GRU intelligence or not?
You dent Russia doesnât assassinate it citizens?
Your not getting how the law works. Itâs not the responsibility of the accused to prove guilt. You want to prosecute, you need evidence and you have to divulge it to the accused.
Personally i would laugh if they turned up with a lawyer. Itâd be meuller 2.
You havenât answered the questions.
Just like you then.
Stick to the provable. Is Mayâs statement to parliament a known lie?
Have you noticed that all our actors in this farce served in the same tank regiment?
I bet the Russians have noticed.
Was Dawn Sturgess a gunner?
Medic, but not one of the ones i was referring to, as iâm sure you know.
Worked out if May deliberately lied to Parliament yet?