You wouldnât believe it anyway, your whole agenda is totally framed towards blaming the British Government, even with circumstantial evidence pointing towards Russia not Britain you still donât have it in you.
Blinded by hate.
But youâre giving the fingerprints TO Russia. Russia arenât going to get the fingerprints and say theyâre the same? They need to send the guys to have their fingerprints taken independently, which is not what theyâre proposing.
You think the ever changing fairytale holds up?
Someoneâs blinded.
Explain the boys not getting contaminated, if we are to believe the official story and why our lot didnât bother about them. What did they already know?
So what happened with the boys? Not read about them.
Tin foil, deflectors shields fully up and operational SirâŚ
Nothing, which is strange, seeing as Skripal handed them bread to feed the ducks and they even ate some. This was in the afternoon in Salisbury, not long before they were poisoned on the bench.
What happened to the first responder(doctor, that was lucky) that said she feared being contaminated before anyone even knew they were poisoned(mystic Meg?). She then said she didnât want to be involved and promptly disappeared. I would have thought the police would like to talk to her, in an attempted murder case.
The consultants letter to the Times?
âSir, Further to your report (âPoison exposure leaves almost 40 needing treatmentâ, Mar 14), may I clarify that no patients have experienced symptoms of nerve agent poisoning in Salisbury and there have only ever been three patients with significant poisoning.â
It shows Barry. Keep up the good work 
So, did they hand them bread, or did they let them get the bread out of the bag? You donât usually hand stuff to people, you let them pick it, especially as the bread was likely in the bag.
Handed according to the boys, their mum and i believe cctv also confirms it.
The same hand that they reportedly closed the door with?
Both of them?
That aside, consider cross contamination between closing the door and getting the bread out(itâs a fair amount of time and lots of moving about). There is no way it wouldnât be on both hands by then(driving). Just as well it wasnât a nerve agent thatâs 10x more deadly than the best before it.
Closing the door, I would expect to be done with one hand.
It all depends how much was on each hand and how much was on the door handle - weâre not assuming the whole hand was covered, are we?
If it turns out that those Russianâs were ex-military, and had traveled on fake documents, what would your opinion be then?
Reading up on the bread thing, the story seems a bit odd because it looks like the bread was handed out at a different park to the one they were found slumped, and that the likely situation was that they went to the park to feed the ducks, walked home, came into contact with the Novichok, left in the car, went to Zizziâs and then went to the other park, where they were found.
It doesnât really matter how much contamination there might have been, if the door handle story was true. They knew about the boys and werenât bothered. That suggests they knew all along the door handle was not involved. It was a different park but the time was after any possible chance they returned home(1:45pm?) and nothing has been released that would point at that being the case. That only leaves a couple of hours and you have forgotten the pub, as well.
All Russian males over a certain age are ex military, so that proves nothing. Dodgy documents would raise some questions, but without a link to the state, could just as easily be supplied by any number of the Russian criminals we harbor.
Hereâs a question. The government have said that they have had to Bury some of the vehicles. Why, after telling people to use baby wipes and everything will be fine. The hotel room was miraculously decontaminated by a single swab, but multiple vehicles(Skripals couldnât have been in all of them) canât be decontaminated.
This has a lot of what we were talking about in it @WorzelScummage
It also raises serious questions about Bellingcat, which makes me wonder why the msm use it as source without question.
Postol: â[Higgins] has done a very nice job collecting information on a website. As far as his analysis, itâs so lacking any analytical foundation itâs clear he has no idea what heâs talking about.â
Lloyd: âI know people like to see [Higgins] as a weapons expert, but unless you crunch the numbers, you donât know what youâre doing. Until you do the math, youâre not an expert.â
Neal Krawetz, the founder of FotoForensics.com â that is, the website used by Bellingcat to analyse the images. He described Bellingcatâs approach as âhow not to do image analysisâ.
The problem now is that I donât trust any website. All weâre ever told in here is x, y, z website shouldnât be trusted because theyâre in the pockets of the Government, a, b, c canât be trusted because their editors are too right-wing/young. Canât trust the Guardian now as they donât support Corbyn etc etc.
It doesnât matter what links are posted up now - I donât trust any of them.
Thatâs the perfect place to start from.
Lots of links to back up claims is a must in the computer age, but always have a bit of distrust(itâs healthy).
You shouldnât trust any website automatically.
The same, if not more, goes for broadcast news.
Elliot Higgins, otherwise known as Bellingcat, that all our msm quote as gospel(not one question). That really needs some thinking about.
Ahem, point of order:
Or Sotonians tbf
1 Like