I agree with myself.
I have a similar reaction to Murray as you, Bob. There’s something about the way he lays out his case that seems as extreme as those that he’s calling out.
That doesn’t mean that I doubt what he’s saying is true. On Salisbury I could quite easily believe he’s a lone voice of truth, but I get a sense that he’s over-egging it and that he has quite some agenda.
But don’t we all?
He made a post a couple of weeks ago where he suggested that Israel had the capability to have been behind the Salisbury nerve agent attack and I really couldn’t understand why he brought them into the discussion.
It struck me as an odd direction for his discussion to go in.
Still does.