OK there is a weird logic behind it howeverâŚ
Which is?
Iâm not clicking on daily fail to help them get more advertising revenue.
On a âworld tourââŚa literal âworld tour.â
Wowzer. Sheâs still going.
She aims to play in every country on this tour so rocked up in a âvillage hallâ in Syria much to everyoneâs bemusement (well 70 of them) and a 50 year old Brit mercenary called Monty.
Saw her at a 2 day festival type gig in Dubai ages ago loved it, but not enough to go see her next gig in Yemen or Mogadishu
Interesting angle from BBC
Odd The was no issue about the death of her other kid.
A swift look at Twatter and there seems little sympathy- but it is populated mainly by nutters tbfâŚ
Labour supporting a Muslim.
Surprised we havenât been deafened by howls of complaints from those attacking their anti-semitism position.
I reported a FB comment last night as âhate speechââŚit was quickly removed.
âSomething about how the baby should have been wrenched from the woman womb before birth etc etcâ
Fuckinâ disgraceful.
Its tragic and very very sad, but she simply shouldnât have gone, brainwashing wonât cut it legally, the Sharon Tateâs murderers were brainwashed but theyâre still in prison. Its no defence.
Just found thereâs a legal document about whether it is. Also we do now have coercive control which could apply.
Whatever, bring her to UK. Investigate, prosecute if there is a case, whilst also working with her to de-radicalise. Treat her the same as the other people who have already come back. Some of them made a choice as an adult.
The liberals can use all the wrangling they want to but they shouldnât act surprised when there is a populist reaction.
How arrogant are they? Were they so saddened concerning Alan Henning and many others?
We should say theyâre lucky theyâre not tried under a system they recognise and value but our one and if they had the courage of their convictions theyâd fail to recognise ours laws and only state to he tried under theirs?
Can you see that happening? The Irish nationalists do it so itâs not unprecedented.
Iâm afraid I really donât understand what you say here. Could be a bit hungover or sleep deprived. May try later and see if I can understand it.
Something about liberals(thatâs everyone that disagrees with a certain view) should be charged under some different system, they apparently believe in(Sharia Law iâd guess).
Wonder if the liberals know about this?
- If the liberals defend Begum donât be surprised of a populist backlash.
- How arrogant are liberals in their white saviour complex?
- They werenât so appalled and didnât complain more heavily in the awful killing of Alan Henning (by the group Begum supports).
- Theyâre lucky theyâre tried under Western laws and not the ones they want to live under.
- If they had real conviction theyâd failed to recognise our British (Western) courts and want to be tried under a system they want to live under.
They wouldnât do that though as theyâre shithouses.
No theyâre just try to close down conversation they donât like, the snowflake doesnât have the capacity for disagreement.
The illiberal liberal.
By wrangling, you mean the law?
@Barry-Sanchezâs repeated use of the term âliberalâ, coupled with his massive misunderstanding of the term in a political context is very revealing about where he gets his news from.
Who else massively confuses the term liberal into a broad pejorative for anything they donât like?
Hmm, itâs the US alt-right, init.
Breitbart Sanchez.
The law can be twisted as we all know, if you get caught going through a red it 3 points at the minimum and a fine, a celebrity? No problem call Nick Freeman.
If it was cut and dried itâd be sorted, these things are minutiae and very open to interpretation.