Interesting! I saw the one with Sky - the one to one after the game - and he seemed to be quite clearly determined that he will say something when the time is right, portraying that all is not what is seems. So, predictions!
As I know it (and please correct me if iām wrong) the allegations centre around a security guardās word about someone he saw taking footage and then recognised him from the Saints website. 2+2 = SPY! I think that is correct? On Sky Sports News this morning, they had a reporter from the āvery spotā the spy was allegedly filming. It was on a public footpath that looked 200 / 300 yards, at least, from the training facilities. It could have been further away. The whole area was open and visible, save for a small wire fence and a standard short rural metal gate with a āKeep Outā sign on it, which presumably, he did keep out of. So, probably an often used path for dog walkers, golfers, etc.
Thereās no fooking way he could have recorded any audio at that distance. Video, yes, but theyād have been tiny! The whole thing centres of the word of a security guard. Boro obviously have not taken any steps to discourage viewing of their training facilities. This whole story seems more unlikely by the day.
Prediction!! Charges against Saints are dropped, charges levied against Boro for fabricating a story to disrupt our preparation for the game. 
Iām going down a fooking rabbit hole here! Time to get back to work. 
4 Likes
Well after watching both legs of the semi-final on TV Iād like to ask any of the expert football analysts (i.e. pundits) how Saints used this supposed illegally gained information to win by the odd goal in extra time of the second leg?
It should make a fascinating listenā¦
2 Likes
It doesnāt matter, if you read the comments in this article Saints are guilty
As @Numptyboi has pointed out, their training ground is pretty open to all around, and the grassy knoll that they ācaughtā the guy on is part of a walk around the golf course.
They then identified him as a Southampton employee??
If weāre thrown out then we have the right to appeal, we all know this, that would delay the Final, that isnāt going to happen, weāll get a fine.
If guilty we should be punished but the holier than thou shit is wearing thin, football is corrupt from top to bottom, that doesnāt detract from our charge but it is.
What advantage was gained from this concerning the game last night?
None, it didnāt affect the result one bit.
1 Like
The Grouse is out of the house 
We have to hold our hands up, thatās the most accurate assessment Iāve seen so far
1 Like
I love the fact that other fans (especially boro) are analysing Tondaās body language and tone in interview as if this confirms his involvement. He looks shifty and unblinking all of the time
2 Likes
Gibson already engaged Nick de Marco, the lawyer who got SWās points reduction reduced⦠I just cant believe how fucking ridiculous Boro are behaving as if this really had any impact on the result⦠Hellberg is heartbroken⦠possibly because he missed a huge promotion bonusā¦playing the emotional card⦠And nearly all media seem against us. Yet so blinkered that they do fuckall about the real cheating that goes on each week on the pitch ⦠cunts
3 Likes
As a result, the EFL brought in regulation 127, which specifically states āno club shall directly or indirectly observe (or attempt to observe) another clubās training session in the period of 72 hours prior to any matchā.
Southampton are charged with breaching both, and they have made no attempt to deny the allegations.
Maybe we have made no attempt to deny it as itās not true the guy acted alone which will be proved at the tribunal and Boro and the EFL will run and hide when Saints then sue them for defamation.
Also I have seen that āa security guardā identified the 19 year old kid
How acvurate is that?
Boroās failure here was play victim not create siege mentality
Yep
Instagram the spy method of choice
1 Like
State of the art surveillance and recording equipment 
3pm kickoff
BoxPark end again.
Wembley selling VIP tickets
1 Like