“…you are simply and apologist for this attacks and rapes that have happened, you say its a conspiracy, what proof do you have?”
We’ll put the proof reading to one side but you are clearly, in my opinion, wide of the mark and therefore should apologise (for this statement).
The whole proof of conspiracy/ISIS planned attacks is a discussion that could be had but not after calling GA a rape apologist.
Put that one to bed first and move on mate.
The proof and the remark go hand in hand.
But GA was discussing possible theories regarding these attacks. He certainly wasn’t apologizing for anything. If you think he was then can you show some proof for your assertion? If not then you should withdraw the comment and apologise.
So as opposed to 1000 bombers, snipers and suicide killiers who have made their from the borders of Syria and beyond ISIS have sent over 1000 beige coated streakers and opportunist pervs? Do me a favour.
Was GA making EXCUSES for rape though Baz? Regardless of anything else.
A theory was purported that would/could dilute the argument or possibility that there are too many asylym seekers in Germany and in turn serve thoughts that these events could be a series of misunderstandings and misgivings which is absolute shit.
NO Barry - this is made up. A theory was NOT put forward to dilute any argument about too many asylum seekers in Germany - nore wa sany theory put forwrad that suggests such hideous acts were ‘misunderstandings’? how the flying fuck does your mind work if your make this shit up form what was posted here… seriously lacking an in abilty to fucking read and comprehend - go back to school.
A speculative thought was put forward that based on a the FACT that these hideous attacks have now seen a shift in attitude towards the migrants, distrust, and a rational concern (given the nature of the crimes committed). The resulting recent ‘mob’ backlash shows how this mistrust can quickly turn to something more violent.
This mistrust, and potential for furtehr breakdown in relations between migrant and local community is exactly the type of thing ISIS want, fearing any unity of purpose btween western and muslim cultures (which the majority stand for). The speculation and thought was very simple; that the frequency and timing of the assults could have bene in some way coordinated? as it is the exact sort of cuntish thing ISIS would possible consider - the aim of which is to breed division.
Now please explain to me how this is an apology for rapists?.. I wont hold my breath because you seem hell bent on making yourself look more of a cunt with every fucking word.
Do you genuinely believe that? Its a non commital throwaway deniable piece of rubbish, coordinated sex attacks devised by ISIS? A bomb by ISIS would spread more resistance to asylum dont you think?
Division was always there and Merkels popularity was waning and to be fair so was Pergida but now they have a renaissance.
Its non commital,either you believe in it or you dont, in theory we could talk about Saints winning the title and what we would do that eveving but we know its a load of old bollocks.
Barry you need to go learn a little about the definition of a hypothesis and theory. My speculation is not even a theory, its merely a hypothesis, which would need to be tested through available evidence - hypotheses are just that, you dont believe or not believe in them, merely suggest them. The accumulation of evidence for or against will eventually prove or disprove… multiple proven hypotheses may eventually lead to a theory. Or is that too confusing for you?
Do I think it was POSSIBLE that there was some coordination with these attacks? Yes its possible.
What could possibly lead me to this hypotheis? Because of the number and timing of the attacks… yes it could be a large coincidence, yes there are other hypothesis for the frequencyand timing, but they are not being discussed here.
What evidence do I have for this hypothesis? None, its just that, a hypothesis… that is the beauty of discussion, people with brains can offer up such thoughs for discussion.
But I think its a bollocks hypothsis… well fair enough, maybe elaborate a little bit on why or offer an alternative but dont suddenly call me an apologist for rapists - made up out thin air - that just makes you look like a cunt or a loon.
What would be the point? He clearly believes himself to be in the right, no matter how many words have been put into attempts to persuade him otherwise. He has no interest in listening, only in rebutting that which he wants other people to be saying, whether they’re actually saying those things or not. In this case, they’re not.
An aplogy has to be genuine if it is to mean anything. You won’t get a genuine apology from Barry on this.
Been distracted form working - but you are right, would mean nothing anyway. Must confess that I am no longer that bothered. I shoudl not have let it wind me up so well. It’s more a desire to ensure the rational folks on here are not under a wrong impression.
Thing is Lou, I am not trying to win anything - Like I said so many pages/hours ago, I presented a POV for discussion - I could be so far of the mark, If anything I would hope I was. But the ‘outrage’ has been about being called an apologist for rapists. To me that goes beyond web banter and pusedo personas of 'ok in real life ’ folk - normal Ok in real life folk dont do that. Its the domain of fucking arseholes …IMHO
Yes it is a bollocks hypothesis because saying these people were agents of others implies what they were doing was professional and not lust and pack animal mentlaity when all the video evidence and complaints state otherwise, so in turn your theory could be seen as action to weaken the current charges by the authorites without foundation and in turn defending a rapist, its not difficult to see your slant on that was and is incendiary given there is no proof of that. Whether you meant that or not is another thing altogether.
but you are clearly, in my opinion, wide of the mark and therefore should apologise (for this statement).
but you are clearly, in my opinion, wide of the mark and therefore should apologise (for this statement).