đŸ‡·đŸ‡ș Russia

Or was that guy lying by omission and has Scott Ritter got it right?

1 Like

Not sure many people have referred to it as a “failed” invasion. More that is hasn’t gone quite the way the Russians had envisaged, in terms of speed of taking objectives.

Who’s thought it had failed, its failed Putin’s expectations, you’ll probably be waving that Russian flag soon.

Not sure schlong was taking a particular position that time

Seems to be happy the Russians are advancing, who’d have thought using illegal ordnance and having 150,000 troops would do that?
The resistance will prove Russia will not be able to hold the Country and that is what Putin wants, the only way that will happen is if Ukraine agrees to it and as it stands I can not see that happening.

How so? It looks as though @Donkey_Schlong posted a link to 2 contrasting views on the invasion. Where does he side with either one?

And after reading Scott Ritter then he appears to be a Putin apologist, he has retweeted someone saying “No one placing the Russian intervention in historical context”
Russian intervention = Invasion.
Historical context = Ukrainian servitude.

I’d go and have a read of Scott Ritter tweets and then maybe you’ll get some balance and context.

So did @Donkey_Schlong state his agreement with either Ritter or Kofman?

It’s a plain statement of fact, nothing more. I would stick to assigning motives onto fictional characters. They don’t argue back :wink:

You’d post it for balance or to further your point of view, he can make himself clear on Scott Ritter though, he can clear that up that up, that makes sense.

Oh how I’ve missed your word salad.
Slowly now
where does @Donkey_Schlong agree with either Ritter or Kofman?
Or do you state he’s “happy the Russians are advancing” because you want to goad him into a row?

Scott Ritter is also a convicted paedophile.

Who? @Donkey_Schlong?

I think you might want to reconsider that or start considering your next holiday from Sotonians. Not a good time for a personal pronoun.

No no row needed, putting the views of pro Russian tweeter of a dubious background pushing the advance of Russia into Ukraine (this is a man who said he’d eat his tie if Ukraine hasn’t fallen in 7 days, go on have a look) is a fair a balanced look, go for it but expect to be pulled up for it if incorrect or not balanced.

No Ritter.

Edit your post please.

Have done, wasn’t done with any intention of smearing the writer, apologies for any confusion.

Nope, just the consequence of unthinkingly frothing at the mouth.