When talking about Roger Helmer being a homophobe, who you were just previosly championing, you then said what about Islam. Defelcting away from Roger Helmer, onto Islam. Which had nothing to do with the conversation.
There is certainly a hint of Islamaphobia coming through though. Tell us more about Luton, where are you going with that? More about Islam.
Funny, you were talking about Europe. Where does Islam come into that?
Championing him? He is an arsehole who happens to a be a good speaker and who believes we should be out of Europe like myself, for different reasons but the goal is the same, you confuse yourself that we are the same as we want the same thing, thatās ignorance as I have been in the unions for over 20 years and hate fascism, racism and homophobia.
You do realise that I chose Luton as thatās where Indians went to work on the Bedford van as they asked to the booming motor industry (Vauxhall). I could have mentioned Coventry, Bolton, Dewsbury and many others places, they are all the same in that respect.
I mentioned Islam as homophobic as a similarity to Helmer as correctly stated he was a homophobe.
You sound fascist labelling people, your not fascist are you? Its something only a fascist would do, the funny thing is the thing you supposedly despise is what you are.
Please identify how and where I have suggested there is any confusion? Itās those right wingers and their media who seem happy to interchange the terms that I am critical ofā¦which you well know, but as you consitsently demonstrate by deliberately WUMing, you like to completing ignore what is actually said and respond to some sort of fictional/imagine post⦠if you want to take part, you need to recognise its not just about be able to read, but about being able to comprehendā¦
Lol forever. Oh Barry, itās so transparent. To use your old saying, deflector shield fully up.
Replying to āHelmer is a homophobeā with āYeah, well so is Islamā (in a conversation that has sod all to do with Islam) is the absolute definition of deflection.
As for that final paragraph. āNo you areā. Top stuff, thatās what, an 8 year oldās level?
So you havenāt given a solution, you have sat from the sidelines sniping and making incorrect assumptions of racism (that always cracks me up as the person invariably throwing that insult is an inverted racist who loves mock shock indignation), I have given my opinion to the crisis and to the European Union, whatās yours?
Quit your whining and criticizing (thatās is boring, banal and very Kevin the teenager) and fucking commit yourself, are you a politician?
Iāve told you, I have no interest in debating with you. Itās pointless. You deflect, shift goal posts and just go on and on. Iāll just say when you are talking shite, which letās face it is practically a full time job anyway.
This is why real debates have moderation. Itās about making real points, and not simply boring or tiring out the other person til they just give up.
I havenāt shifted any goalposts, you have seen ghosts that arenāt there, they aināt no ghosts no matter how much you want them to be.
You also havenāt raised anything that contributes (to my thread Iāll add) other than whining and criticism and putting no questions or answers yourself.
And then after all of that and not getting a response thatās fits in with your 17th century witch-hunt cry moderation!
Moderation? Moderation from your false incorrect accusations and rubbish discussion points, away with you son and get a book.
You start a thread about Europe & immigration. Then move to start talking about Islam & conflating migrations/refugees. Thatās a shift in goal posts, Muslims arenāt coming from Europe. The refugee/migrant conflation is textbook reactionary tactic btw.
Start talking about Cities lost, where the happens to be large Muslim populations. Again, nothing to do with Europe getting a bashing on QT.
You said how well Helmer performed, I commented he is a homophobe and you start talking about Islam.
Donāt blame me you canāt keep up with your own nonsense dude.
Also, the dazzling lack of self-awareness in this petulant line is glorious
You also havenāt raised anything that contributes (to my thread Iāll add)
Lol forever. Oh Barry, itās so transparent. To use your old saying, deflector shield fully up.
Replying to āHelmer is a homophobeā with āYeah, well so is Islamā (in a conversation that has sod all to do with Islam) is the absolute definition of deflection.
As for that final paragraph. āNo you areā. Top stuff, thatās what, an 8 year oldās level?
What religion are most of the economic migrants/refugees? You see the similarity with Helmer and the Mulsim faith, theyāre both homophobic, no question, are you being deliberately afflicted?
Iāve told you, I have no interest in debating with you. Itās pointless. You deflect, shift goal posts and just go on and on. Iāll just say when you are talking shite, which letās face it is practically a full time job anyway.
This is why real debates have moderation. Itās about making real points, and not simply boring or tiring out the other person til they just give up.
I havenāt shifted any goalposts, you have seen ghosts that arenāt there, they aināt no ghosts no matter how much you want them to be. You also havenāt raised anything that contributes (to my thread Iāll add) other than whining and criticism and putting no questions or answers yourself. And then after all of that and not getting a response thatās fits in with your 17th century witch-hunt cry moderation! Moderation? Moderation from your false incorrect accusations and rubbish discussion points, away with you son and get a book.
You start a thread about Europe & immigration. Then move to start talking about Islam & conflating migrations/refugees. Thatās a shift in goal posts, Muslims arenāt coming from Europe. The refugee/migrant conflation is textbook reactionary tactic btw.
Start talking about Cities lost, where the happens to be large Muslim populations. Again, nothing to do with Europe getting a bashing on QT.
You said how well Helmer performed, I commented he is a homophobe and you start talking about Islam.
Donāt blame me you canāt keep up with your own nonsense dude.
Helmer is a homophobic and so is the words written in the Qurāan, do you disagree?
Helmer regardless of being a bellend handled himself well, wheres the conflict in that?
You simply donāt like to read it, open you mind and stop looking for things.
Cities lost? I refer to when Britain asked workers from the Commonwealth (they held British pasports) to come to Britain to work, I could have mentioned many places, the fact you saw Muslims (where did I mention them in Luton) and I didnāt mention them speaks volumes. And to the exact Cities lost itself, thatā was the British Car industry.
School boy error krg. Just like the crying woman shouldnāt be surprised the tories have shafted her, you shouldnāt be surprised with Barryās arguing style, heās had it from the start. Just keep going on and on and on and on, deflect, on and on and on, when you give up posting he marks it down as a victory on the little chart he has on the wall of his bedsit.
Yup, I know. Iāve said this several times on this thread and others.
I keep raising it, as I donāt want this place to descend into what the other place descended into before Barry got banned. Every thread was the same, Barry just spouting the same bollocks over and over (no matter the subject of the thread - hence how hilarious that little tantrum just now was).
Itās an issue that does need to be thought about. In fairness to Barry, for a fair few months he kept a lot of this in check and was a good member here. But he is certainly falling into old habits, that are plainly transparent.
Iāve said it before, but moderation is not a bad thing. Moderation is not a hinderence to free speech, it helps foster it. If an unmoderated space is allowed to be taken over by the person with the most endurance and will to listen to their same points endlessly, that strangles any real opportunity for debate or discussion. Which is why, as I pointed out, any real irl debate will have a moderator.
This isnāt really moderation, more a statement of what I think is going on. I think itās fair to say that Bazza either doesnāt have much experience with Muslim folk, and if he has, then it probably hasnāt gone well. For someone that has historically identified himself as a Labour supporter, many of the arguments he is putting forward are pretty right wing, or at least its the crap you hear out of them.
In thread, I think Barryās performance has been hampered by the following.
a) an inability, feigned or real, to comprehend what others have written.
rationale: the point about young men was answered before he raised it again.
b) a lack of direct experience with Muslim folk (noted before).
rationale: Shit scared of the idea of a majority Muslim town.
Come on Pap is the Quran homophobic? Iāve been asking the other lads but they donāt want to answer, would be because their argument point loses validity?
The UK leaving the EU unites both left and right, the supposed people of the left in this country can not understand this view.