They go to show how many people think our club is run by people who’re prepared to gamble on our future, their money, if we go down they’ll lose between £80-100 Million.
They have balls as they’re relying on a pure wank squad, you confident on that bet?
They turned down £12m in a heart beat. You would have gone mental if we’d spunked £20m on a player untested in the pl, that was young and still developing. This goes against everything you believe, but it’s a stick and you love a beating(or bleating).
No I wouldn’t have, we spunked £19 Million on Carrilo ha ha, I could list some of our absolute wank signings over the last 3 years so buying a young goalscorer when we need one isn’t going to make me go crazy.
Missed out as we weren’t prepared to pay.
Simple as that.
Apologies are mine. Started replying to Barry and got distracted, so didn’t notice when i continued.
Still it’s amusing seeing the sea change. Something that was anathema a few short weeks ago, is now the missed priority according to Barry. He’s advocating spunking £40m on an untried kid.
Any stick will do.
Bob mentioned it as the going rate. You advocated paying what it took and didn’t dispute Bob’s valuation.
You’ve gone mental whether it be £20m or £40m. £15m tops(£6m made up of performance targets and if we’re as shit as you say, that’s something that we won’t have to worry about ever paying).
What 180?
We should have paid, we didn’t and we could have lost out.
Accept this, disagree with it but accept what I am saying.
A career on ice? Ha Ha coming from a man stationed in Pyongyang.
Has all the money gone on players(as you have stated), or out the club to Gao(as you have also stated)?
You stated(multiple times) that buying kids is too big a gamble, then decry(when it’s too late) that we didn’t spunk upwards of £20m on an untried kid.
We offered, they said no(after having their bluff called). You advocate doing a scummy Liverpool fc act?