Nooooo
It was a post about how under Ralph he had scored 60 odd in 120 odd games vs 9 in 23 for Hughes.
Now he can argue about that with himself for a week
If thatās a euphemism for taking a shit, you can fuck right off. 
1 Like
Donāt come on here confusing things Phil, we just about had the situation under control.
1 Like
There is no trouble as far as Iām concerned, no confusion either.
YOU and YOU alone are the only one comparing our deal for Ings with straight up loan deals for Walcott and Sims.
The official announcement for Ings stated āahead of a permanent move next summer.ā
Nothing about an option to buy, or subject to appearances, nor implying any other alternative option than him joining permanently.
No such thing was said about Walcott or Sims.
You are therefore comparing apples and oranges.
How dare you! Heās never wrong! You just donāt understand the nuance!
Sorry, read that as nonce 
2 Likes
Heās wrong you knowā¦
Iām not comparing, Iām saying theyāre the same, loan deals initially, nothing more, nothing less.
Nope. One is a loan with an option to buy, one is a loan with a commitment to buy. They are not the same. Nothing more, nothing less.
1 Like
So theyāre loans?
But not the same. Do you understand the nuances of the loan system?
1 Like
Guys you could always try NOT feeding the troll
2 Likes
Out of interest, take a look at the BBC ratings for the spurs west ham game. West hoofs lowest rated player (Fabianski) is rated higher than spurs highest rated (Kane)
2 Likes
