It would mean the end of democracy in this Country or whatever we had left, all elections could then be overturned, laws could simply be pushed through. 1000 years gone, they wouldn’t dare or they would if they didn’t have to put their names to it.
Things being decided for you with no voice?
That’s par for the course.
The funny thing would be people going against a referendum result because they didn’t like the way it turned out.
It was an advisory referendum and, I believe, the democratic process is for that issue to then be debated in Parliament, before any action is taken. I’m no constitutional expert though. It seems as though the action by Mischon de Reya is to ensure Parlaimentary debate.
4 Likes
What do we want?
British Sovereignty!
When do we want it?
Not just yet!
4 Likes
They’ll have to reveal their clients, they won’t say the banks and big corps, it could enter parliamentry debate of course it could but no one will publicly go against a vote advisory or otherwise, duping the people and democracy would bring down a lot more than the Government AND the EU wouldn’t accept it, take that in to account, they wouldn’t accept the gerrymendering of a vote regardless of what a lawyer serf acting for the City says.
Thats a different point totally, it should be triggered as soon as we have leaders of the Government and also the official opposition.
There should be as the leader wouldn’t have a mandate from the people, sure they can say they have a manifesto but that isn’t a confidence vote in the leader.
OK, I’ve listened to it and it is well balanced apart from it’s all about the campaign that Leave performed, it leaves out the arguments agains the Remain’s campaign project fear but that is an aside
What I don’t understand is the bit around the 8 minute mark where he is talking about the deal Cameron bought back from the European Council and he states that is had major reforms for the UK especially about how the Single Market and the Single Currency worked and also a power of Veto for National Parliaments over EU legislation.
Now I may have been living in a mud hole but I don’t remember any of these concessions, I seem to remember the only ones being that we didn’t have to pay child benefit for the first 5 years!! Or is he talking about something else that we didn’t get to hear about??!!??
Originally posted by @BTripz
Originally posted by @saintbletch
Originally posted by @lifeintheslowlane
Another good watch, 'slowlane.
I loved the fact that he had to break the types of Leave campaign deception/lies (that he saw) into 3 different categories.
OK, I’ve listened to it and it is well balanced apart from it’s all about the campaign that Leave performed, it leaves out the arguments agains the Remain’s campaign project fear but that is an aside
What I don’t understand is the bit around the 8 minute mark where he is talking about the deal Cameron bought back from the European Council and he states that is had major reforms for the UK especially about how the Single Market and the Single Currency worked and also a power of Veto for National Governments.
Now I may have been living in a mud hole but I don’t remember any of these concessions, I seem to remember the only ones being that we didn’t have to pay child benefit for the first 5 years!! Or is he talking about something else that we didn’t get to hear about??!!??
I chuckled at that bit, his neutrality is unmasked, he is more concerned about the North of Ireland than the UK as a whole.
Ah the Great Western Lie…
You guys still believe you have a Democracy…
As opposed to having a “Ruling Elite”
Which is why tbf you are in such a mess - you gave the Elite a right bloody nose and for all the mess it has made one way or another, well done Blighty
1 Like
And using Mishcon de Reya is harfdly the best example, haven’t they been mentioned in the Panama papers? Ha ha I always knew the remainers were big corps, tax dodgers and London elites but this takes the biscuit.
Voted down because you said I called the people who voted to leave thick. I did not. I said that people are thick. I said that in reference to the way that the effect that advertising has on the general public.
The law firm cited in the Panama Papers was Mossack Foneseca
Fish, Neolithic people, Beaker Folk, Romans, Anglo Saxons, Normans, Vikings, Huguenots, Indians & Poles etc coming over here taking our jobs. Bloody immigrants!
4 Likes
If we don’t stop it now this country will be turned into a bloody race of mongrels!
It’s a good job that we’ve no longer got Doggerland*.
* it’s not what you think, bletch. Put it away.
4 Likes
How do you link to a facebook video, the one that’s pinned on this guys page speaks a lot of truth!!
Will this solve the LSE being outside of Europe??
–
Alex Andreou @ sturdyAlex 43m43 minutes ago
London Stock Exchange shareholders just voted 99.9% to approve their merger with Deutsche Boerse. Hurrah for sovereignty.
If we had a referendum on bringing back 1960’s legislation on capital punishment & homosexuality they’d probably be a disappointingly high % of the British public voting for it.
The public are idiots! Instead of democracy, what we need is a benevolent dictator.
I think Sooty would be good, he’d get shit done and wouldn’t need to talk about it first.
6 Likes