Barry, please read the post for context - consider ‘exploit’ a tongue in cheek comment - it really is very simple - allowing those from countries we have exploited, the opportunity to live and work here to better their lot - it was in reference to our former colonies/Commonwealth etc…
I was ‘debating’ at what point/criteria our ‘obligations’ might cease, or whether as a true socialist, such issues matter not, that all with a desire to better their lot should have opportunity regardless of where they come from…
For your “context” I read a cheap snide shot and its ok for us to be exploited as we exploited years ago?
How is that progressive and how is that humanitarian?
If you say so Barry, if you say so , it must be so… What is pathetic is your inability to comprehend a simple point - a simple question to our socialist friends, where does your compassion stop?
Yeah, but May is also seeking concessions too. I just found it an amusing demonstration of where power actually lies in Europe.
In related news, I do find May’s present “no Brexit at all” threat a little shite. Does the Prime Minister really intend to ignore 17.4m to whip her MPs into shape?
That’s not true though, is it. As a remainer, presumably you follow the “it’ll be a disaster if we leave” line. Therefore the best you can hope for is the worst outcome when we leave, which is more likely to propel us back into the land of milk and honey that we’re abandoning than a trading deal which might mask what a disaster it is. Or something.
Yes, but I also have to put the lives of the poor into consideration - if we leave and it’s a disaster, the poor will get considerably poorer, with only the disaster that is universal credit to keep them going. Personally I can’t find it within myself to accept that kind of collateral damage.
Quite. Chertsey is just the latest incarnation of an identity that has consistently cared about the poor. See also; Unbelievable Jeff and Dibden Purlieu Saint and you’ll know he really cares.