Folks Iāve spoken to tend to agree⦠which is not surprising⦠Tory voters have been Created by telling folks their vote diid not count if they voted labour or anyone but Tory⦠which was the kind of shit you were spouting ⦠just like Cummings wanted you to⦠you just canāt handle the fact you were played by such a cunt
The numbers still suggest otherwise, but constant propaganda is persuasive i suppose.
Truthās closer to this.
āIt is enough that the people know there was an election,ā The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything."
Joseph Stalin(not really ).
The story of this election is exactly about how it was predicted and followed through(just ask Pompeo).
not a bad effort! But must try harder. Thankfully most folks I know have the wit and intelligence to actually answer questions as opposed to just ignoring unpleasant truthsā¦
You voted for the poor people to be screwed based o. Your principles ahead of pragmatism⦠fair enough, your free democratic choice, but trying to make your choices and yourself fell better by blaming those who did not vote to do that is a mark of guilty desperation⦠just live with it.
Wages in unskilled sectors are rising. Supply and demand. Iād say I canāt believe you still canāt concede this point tonight, but Iāve had three years experience.
I can, and will do the rest, but not for you. For someone genuinely interested in how Brexit affects the poor, not someone thatās been living in a fantastical entitled funk for the past three years and cannot remember the points he has conceded in the past.
I mean, FFS, how many reports from low-wage sectors saying that wages are rising due to Brexit do you actually need?
How many times do we need to tell you that Brexit and itās effects have not happened yet⦠??? What part of that do you not understand? You are basing the impact of Brexit, (that has not happened yet) on the the fact tiose in service sectors have seen a small wage rise? A rise that still does not lift them out of a poverty wage? Mostly folks who are not actually the worst off?
What happens when our economy slows? The first sectors to be fucked over by that are these services, coffee shops, cafes, small hotels⦠letās just agree to come back to this when we are actually seeing the impact of Brexit, not the fact that we have seen a 100,000 or so Eastern Europeanās go homeā¦
Jobs that will not see the worst off get off the poverty trainā¦
You are just desperate, first up the there is a big difference between the financial market reactions to political vagaries as we have seen as part of the Brexit saga, and the real economic impact on our industry, business and subsequent employment levels⦠letās just wait and see the impact when it happens after any trade deal (or more likely no deal) is completed⦠your optimism sounds like āBorisāsā āletās realise our true potential now we are free of the EU shacklesā to paraphrase, it would be pure comedy if not so tragic that folks believe this shitā¦
Iām not desperate. I am resigned to the fact that we have a Tory government for the next five years.
Iām also fine on the likely employment levels thatāll exist post-exit. I do not share your view that an advanced nation of 70m people is going to be persona non grata nor do I think we need to accept German-led appointed rule to run our own affairs.
Besides, you didnāt bother to qualify before. You simply stated that we have not felt any effects of Brexit. That is untrue. We have, and Remainers have screamed blue murder at any bump in the road.
Itās been a problem for years, but you feel free to deny it as it doesnāt fit in with what youāve been programmed to believe.
āPostal voting is open to fraud on an āindustrial scaleā and is āunviableā in its current form, a top judge has said.ā
That was 5 years ago. Since then nothing has been done except a big drive to encourage people to vote by post(from the same party that owns the unfit for purpose company). Now possibly as high as 13m people.
The UN and EU have also both said itās set up for fraud.
The judge in the above quote, Richard Mawrey QC, has also written to the bbc demanding an explanation of why they deliberately broke the law on multiple occasions during the election and has threatened legal action if they donāt give an explanation.
So file it away with everything else that doesnāt fit in with your single issue lie.
What did vote leave promise?
Yes programmed, as is been known for years that our elections/referendums are deliberately set up for fraud, but you point blank refuse to countenance that.
Youāve been told what to think and everything else is automatically dismissed. Sounds like programming to me.
Whatās the nutjob view on what a vote leave offered?
Now a complete break from reality would be someone that refuses to look at whatās been going on.
Itās undeniable that a system has been set up to allow fraud and used accordingly.
Remember Richard Mawrey QC stated that postal voting allows fraud to be carried out on an āindustrial scaleā and that the current system makes election rigging āa possibilityā and, in some areas, āa probabilityā. The senior judge stated that the postal voting system was being used for fraud which would disgrace a ābanana republicā.
If you donāt believe him, how about some Tories.
In 2015, then anti corruption tsar Eric Pickles(yes Eric fucking Pickles even gets it) said
āI would argue that state officialdom is in denial over the real state of electoral fraud in 21st-century Britain.ā
Alan Duncan, told the House that postal voting left
āmassive scope for fraud and undue influenceā, adding: āIt is, at every turn, open to fiddlesā.
Steve Baker MP, the Conservative Member of Parliament for Wycombe and Chairman of the European Research Group(yes) stated
āthe overwhelming majority of my constituents would be shocked if they knew the extent of corrupt election practices and voter fraud which happen each time there is an electionā.
This was after the last election and he went on.
āIf we fail to understand the magnitude of the importance of the corruption of even a single vote, then we are a politically bankrupt nation.ā
Itās happened on multiple occasions, almost like they were building up a system and testing what they could do.
āThere were 265 of those papers so it was fairly easy, that meant that each candidate of the Conservative party would be given 265 votes each. Instead of that someone multiplied the 265 votes by the ten candidates giving them 2650 votes each from the block voting.ā
But they keep telling people to vote by post and every single āmistakeā always favours a tory and the āmistakesā are legion.
Oh maybe so they already know the result as they control the whole process.
Why donāt you try writing a program that compares these results
With these
And see if anything looks odd to you. Or maybe living in a banana republic is ok with you as long as you get to repeat your mantra.
Once youāve ignored that, a simple question.
As a man that bangs on about democracy(but is happy to ignore vote fraud) do you agree that the people should get exactly what vote leave offered?