Which part of ‘the ‘first concern should be for victims’’ did you not undrstand? As regards to my third point, you are illustrating my point extremely well. Thank you
Jeez. It’s all a bit too early in the day for all this for me.
It’s Friday and I’m going to the pub in 3 hours…
Laters…
What part of you fails to understand this didn’t happen due to cultural sensitivities.
John Cleese enters stage left and asks if this is a five minute argument…
Bazz does a Poo in the corner.
Is it Art or just a pile of shit…discuss.
It’ll be art.
Nailed it.
inappropriate
Err? If someone is asleep, you’re not having sex with them - you’re raping them.
Glad you’re not defending them though.
Didn’t he say he wasn’t defending them?
So let us clear this up, what do the liberals make of this? Do they deny people didn’t do their job as they were afraid to do so? What are they saying?
Just remember, Bazza, that whilst all elephants might be grey, not all grey things are elephants.
Is that an answer?
She was awake when I started!
I agree with you in this specific case that’s exactly what happened. Almost as bad appears to have been the police’s lack of interest in believing the claims. However, that’s not why Sarah Champion’s article was ridiculed. It’s the assertation that the UK has a problem with Pakistani gangs grooming and raping white girls. The UK has a problem with sexual offences against women across the board, Pakistani gangs are a small proportion of that. I don’t have any solutions to deal with the rate of sexual offences in the UK, but I doubt focussing on the 2-3% of offences that make for easy headlines in the rightwing press is going to help.
I salute you for your answer, regardless of whether I agree with it at least you answered, the other liberals run away and divert.
Read the whole article if you’re going post it. It said a few. Of course the few might be using that as an excuse for their own failings to protect the vulnerable.
Do you deny the contemptuous attitude held towards these girls by the people paid to protect them?
_ the report said police _ "regarded many child victims with contempt".
I see lots of people from all professions/communities that failed these children. You see only one. Why is that?
We’re talking about the issue of Muslim gangs preying on vulnerable children, want to divert, dilute onto the whole issue of abuse why of course, lets do it.
But on another thread.
Muslim gangs? So they all pop down to the mosque after a night of drunken debauchery? FFS Barry, get a grip.
I’ve said I’m not defending it. Why are you passively trying to imply that I am? Don’t do that.