And it didnât, yet she still died.
QED - Successful mission.
And it didnât, yet she still died.
QED - Successful mission.
You could say the same about Fergie or any of the servants who get fired and have an axe to grind. If she had any more damaging information where is it and why didnât she use it when she had the chance? I am not saying you are wrong because clearly I donât know what went in behind close doors other than what has been said, but there is a certain amount of what if every there. Nothing apparently came out from the multiple phone taps yet we know that Charles wanted to be Camillaâs tampon. If there was anything more sinister I am sure we would have had a sniff of it by now.
Well planned missions do not really on luck for success. You seem certain that she was murdered. Where is your evidence?
Iâve been through all my musings on what happened above, Iâm not repeating it for you. Where is your evidence that it wasnât?
Youâre saying they relied on luck, but I would say what most likely happened was a backup plan that if she wasnât dead or in a terminal state, they ensured she was by the time she got to the hospital. You always have contingency plans in these situations.
I donât need any evidence, I just need to refer you to the outcome of the inquest and countless follow up stories. Iâve just read an interesting feature in Forbes. This well planned hit involved a car chosen at the last minute that should never have been in the road it was in such poor condition. This well planned hit involved a drunken driver who was not licensed to drive this type of car. Al Fayed, the person laying the blame at the feet of Prince Philip, owned the car his son and Diana died in. Al Fayed employed the driver of the car. Such a well planned operation eh?
Thatâs cool, so weâre happy that all inquests are 100% fact then. Cool.
Thereâs a lot of coincidences above, isnât there?
Luck not design? Not even a chance of there being an element of design? Totes âdebunkedâ?
We are going full circle here I think. Iâll catch you all on the Saints thread this evening!
Itâs not difficult. If you canât be bothered to provide the evidence that Diana was murdered, just point me in the direction of it so I can see what you have based your decision on.
Iâm not sure what part of the design includes getting the father of one of the deceased to allow a drunk driver to drive a car that was a write off at excessive speeds through a capital city but whoever worked this all out is worthy of a plot on Mission Impossible, a bit like our chances of spanking City tonight!!
If you just used words like âallegedlyâ or âpurportedlyâ or âapparentlyâ then I wouldnât have a single issue with anything youâve said. But itâs the absolution behind the assertions that I take issue with.
Iâve said my piece and now Iâm actually off.
Do you honestly think there would have been a shred of evidence if it was prearranged?
Taken down on behalf of the poll-ice.
How about âYawn and scroll through it, as youâve seen this boring shitshow played out on other sites.â
tl/dr
I did start to read that but lost the will to live after about 20 minutes.
Contrary to what you you might think Pap, I am very partial to a conspiracy theory and am usually disappointed when they turn out to be untrue (or, in the interest of fairness) unsubstantiated. I also keep an open mind about most of them (apart from the moon landing) but have yet to see anything about Dianaâs death that has made me think that it was any more than a tragic accident. I am more than happy to reconsider should any new evidence come to light (not that anyone gives a feck what I think anyway)
Donât say I donât listen
Nah, I was just messing.
Link here to the whole thing. @Lets-B-Drinking is right. Iâve done this before.
More than anything else, itâs a good guide of how NOT to debate on forums, etc.
Iâve found myself doing loads of this in the past and try to steer clear of these tactics now.
Well done @pap, youâve ruined us now
Remember these techniques are only effective if the forum participants DO NOT KNOW ABOUT THEM. Once they are aware of these techniques the operation can completely fail, and the forum can become uncontrolled
Grains of salt here of course but as someone who has seen the inside of a mental health facility due be being labelled âa theoristâ this whole society levelled psyop cuts close to my bones.
As I said before, if you arenât open to otherâs opinions and go around labelling people, have a good fucking look at yourself. Safety in numbers does not make you righteous