Sorry mate, I’m just off to teach a computing class.
You’ll need to rely on a dictionary to tell you the definitions of paranoid and unnecessarily harsh.
If you’ve got one in the house, it’ll be like a free ride when you’ve already paid.
Ironic, eh? 
Yes…it is ironic. You’re blathering on about people being ostracised and being shouted at but then do exactly the same thing here. It’s ironic that you make that post but don’t see that it’s exactly what you do. And yes, that also makes you a hypocrite.
Well done.
putin
reminds me I need to change my avatar
1 Like
Still don’t think you understand irony.
We could do this all day but I’m not sure what it’s achieving.
I do understand irony.
It’s now your turn… although you could just practice what you were preaching and not ostracise and “shout” at people (Ted) because he has a different point of view
Is the BBC for real?
Is the story for real?
Here’s another story that fails dismally to do what it’s headline claims.
Tracing Guccifer 2.0’s Many Tentacles in the 2016 Election https://nyti.ms/2mgKj9c
I have major issues with the whole thing, as they all ignore the claim that the leak came from Seth Rich. What happened to him?
https://consortiumnews.com/2018/07/14/evidence-will-probably-never-be-produced-in-indictments-of-russian-agents/
How convenient is this?
If that’s true, it’s only because you’re refusing to admit you’re in the wrong on irony and have always managed to see the worst in anything I write, and always ready to attack me personally afterward.
Take a look at your latest intervention. Now, I’m not being funny, but your mate or alt or whatever is a big boy, making some pretty big claims, with very little in the way of articulation or substantiation.
I asked him, politely, to stop the back-handed digs at the site, and have also called him out for guilt tripping people on the Skripal thread.
He can put across his state-sponsored views any time he likes, and I’ll debate them as usual. The digs and attempts at de-legitimisation are annoying, especially in the context of the re-launch.
I also think you’ve done your pal a massive disservice. Anyone reading this will think that he is not able to take care of his own replies, which he is.
In his shoes, I’d rather be having the row myself instead of having to deal with the emasculated protection of someone losing the argument over the simplest things, like irony.
Yes, yes, I know that you could walk into a pub and have someone agree with your Alanis definition. Please, for everyone’s sake, just take it from Ed Byrne for fuck’s sake, or failing that, pick up a dictionary.
What utter nonsense.
Well argued, incisive points.
Having read this thread I am not sure what’s going on really and what the argument is about.
Draw a line and get back to more memes about how Trump is an orange idiot.
6 Likes
Harsh words indeed :-
I am not a fan of Trump but that statement is completely delusional. The 3rd paragraph actually made me lol.
2 Likes
The lady with the best headlines has done a couple of articles on McCain.
All this bile about the risk of peace breaking out between two nuclear powers is fucking mental when you stop and think about it for a moment.
Really? What parts made you lol? Ignoring treaties? Assault on democratic liberties? Or was it the slaughter of Syrian civilians?
Everything has disappeared has trump trumped us or just used his goons to disable the bad words against him?