I won’t read another biased agenda driven crap if its like the last incorrectly biased piece of crap mate.
You’re reaching and why is this only here? Not anywhere else? Its desperate crap mate.
I won’t read another biased agenda driven crap if its like the last incorrectly biased piece of crap mate.
You’re reaching and why is this only here? Not anywhere else? Its desperate crap mate.
I tried mate, I read the first paragraph and it read “undocumented workers” as opposed to illegals immigrants, its bollocks, biased and incorrect.
Is the term incorrect?
Are all undocumented workers in America also illegal immigrants?
Look at the US definition, that should help you.
Nope, not at all. I asked you two questions. Explain it to me.
Barry, serious question. What have you got against liberals? If there were more liberals in the world it would be a safer and nicer place to live. Shares in sandal making companies would also rocket.
Yes the term is an incorrect smokescreen used by liberals.
You need a social security number to work in the states.
This isn’t rocket science.
Type in undocumented worker and it says the definition straight away.
I know what the definition is. Can you now answer the questions please, not your prefered definition of that particular term.
You’ve now raised a third question. Has the term unclassified worker ever been used by the government or legal system of America? If it has, that would suggest the article is correct.
Oh and a fourth, if that term has ever been used by a republican, does that make your first sentence, utter bollocks?
I’m pretty liberal when it comes to how people conduct their personal lives. Consenting adults? As long as you’re not hurting anyone else, get on with it.
Political liberals are a waste of time, standing for nothing except the idea that the world will sort itself out by itself (it won’t). It’s laissez faire as political ideology. The problem is that you can’t afford to be liberal with things like governments, corporations or supra-national organisations. They’ll just take the piss.
The other thing that does my head in about liberal political types is their frequent assertions that they are the only people able to reach compromises, predicated on the fact that they have no actual convictions of their own, thus able to do or say anything.
Governments of different stripes do deals all the time on the stuff they can agree on, without compromising on their show stopppers. The idea that only political chameleons can get anything done is a little disingenuous.
I deliberately used the term liberal rather than Liberal Pap.
Even small “L” liberals come in for some criticism. There are plenty of people who’d describe themselves as such yet do their business for another party.
I always found it quite amusing that the big “L” liberals were most popular with the public when they took stands on matters of principle, such as the Iraq War.
Revolution means change, don’t look at me strange
So I can’t repeat what other rappers be sayin’
You don’t stand for something, you fall for anything
Harder than you think, its a beautiful thing
Saint mate you keep changing the goal posts, I’ve answered the questions and you fire back others from different angles as you don’t like the original answers.
Undocumented worker = Illegal immigrant, thats all there is to it, its not a nice wooly term but it isn’t incorrect either.
How do know that? Probably more wars as more concessions are made and not enough enforcement if I’m allowed to presume.
So, back to the beginning. What’s your problem with the article?
It used undocumented worker so straight away it was angled and biased, it is also bollocks, if you’re undocumented you’re illegal in this instance so why didn’t they say so?
The problem with the word ‘liberal’ is that it has such a plethora of possible meanings as to have become pretty much meaningless. If everyone has their own definition of the term (and it seems from reading stuff on here that this is indeed the case), then it becomes effectively useless.
To me liberal means everything and nothing, it apologises for everything at the expense of everyone. You can be a liberal and a something else but I don’t think you can be solely “a liberal” as it is an elastic term.
Thanks for clearing that up.
Not a million miles away from what I said then. But how can you rail against something that means everything and nothing? You might as well choose your own term and use that. How about ‘squidgleplapper’? I fucking hate those squidgleplappers myself.