An armed mob trying to subvert the democratic activities of an elected body? An armed mob trying to prevent a democratically elected president take office? No, your right Barry, it was just a bit of a lark.
Don’t put words into my mouth, how do you know they were trying to subvert democracy?
They trespassed, invaded and broke the law in many ways but you’re appearing fascist in your assessment of knowing the facts, lets deal with facts not thoughts.
Being armed in the states isn’t against the law, being illegally armed is different quite obviously.
Stick to facts.
They were trying to stop Biden being declared the winner of a democratic election before the January 6th deadline, of course they were trying to subvert democracy. What on earth do you think they were doing? Jeez!
3 Likes
I don’t know, I know they trespassed and destroyed property, their intentions?
That’s an awful lot more difficult, prove it?
You didn’t read the banners or hear the chants or see the interviews of those involved? Ok. Clearly just a fun day out then.
You really cannot be that stupid Barry. Did you see any of the footage? The whole world is aware of the facts apart from you apparently.
I’m with Bazza.
As the font if all legitimate information in the UK - Laura said herself.
There seemed to be a scuffle in the Capitol Building.
1 Like
Trump told them to march on Congress to stop Biden being declared the winner of a democratic election before the cut off deadline of January 6th. Which, armed to the teeth in their thousands, they duly did. Resulting in the deaths of five people, one of them a policeman who succumbed to his injuries today But of course, in the world of Bazza this counts for nothing, entirely coincidental. Given these FACTS, what do you think the intentions were? Go on, hazard a guess.
On another note, Pap has been conducting a passionate secret affair with Anna Soubry for the past ten years. Am i wrong? Prove it!
2 Likes
Did he actually say this verbatim?
It doesn’t matter think, know or anything like that, what can you prove?
Your assumptions may well be correct but they can’t be ascertained can they?
In short you think but you don’t know, I always go on probability and I’ll say they went there with intention but what intention? 50/50 you’re right though but 100% you can’t prove it.
50/50? 50% they went there to stop the democratic process and 50% what? A fucking picnic?
Could be, could be anything.
OK Barry. The Lord of Probability has spoken and there is a 50% chance that the good ol boys were just out for some battenberg and fizzy pop.
1 Like
Yup…
Presumably they dressed in military gear and went equipped with cable ties so they didn’t get seen hanging out the bunting?
1 Like
Presume but we don’t know, you could be right but proof, if the glove don’t fit you must acquit.
You’re the one who always bangs on about what is most probable.
1 Like
Yes as I said its 50/50 but that ain’t guilt is it? There’re nativists or see themselves so and don’t like their changing World, they’re wrong in my book in all of this but you can’t charge a collective with intent can you? One went there to read and the other went to do harm, prove it though.
50/50. Ok Barry.
Did the copper only get 50% of his head smashed in with a fire extinguisher? I bet his family are fucking made up don’t you?
5 Likes