Yes, I believe it would. At the moment, like Special Ed, people can’t and won’t take him seriously as PM material. Any thing to help that, such as dressing like a statesmen instead of like a fucking supply teacher, should be taken on boards. But that’s fine, as I don’t think the Labour party want him to win the next election.
I’m not a Boris fan as such, I think he’s the best of a bad bunch though…
What are you saying, that Hitler didn’t like Jews because they didn’t dress smart? It’s one theory I guess.
Or maybe it’s better to judge someone on what they say/do than what they wear?
I think we should have two governments. One for serious stuff, like infrastructure and the future of the country.
The other one can just give out fashion advice. We’ll split the electorate into two camps based on forum posts.
It’s about Respect pap. I.e. in ur industry, no-one would take a computer bro srs if he turned up well-kempt & smart, you know that’s tru bro, that’s why you wear ur hair like that. If I was in hospital and my surgeon rocked up wearing leather chaps, string vest & handlebar moustache i would be v.dubious, but on other hand if he was dj at gay club i would prob give him suck job by the bins out back, opposite Dallas Fried Chicken.
Royston Smith seems to have a _very _poor memory, and the bastard doesn’t thank you for reminding him!
If someone genuinely thinks that appearance is that important, then they should be working in the fashion industry.
You have a problem, Cherts. The only way you can feasibly defend Cameron is by looking like a shallow cock yourself.
The forum awaits your resolution with baited breath.
don’t worry cherts, Ive got ur back. What we’re saying, pappington, is that the Swing Vote bros who decide elections, like i.e. Bears, we don’t bother about party politics & ideaology & policies, or anything like that, we’re Shallow Cocks and vote purely based on what the candidate looks like & to lesser extent, his Rep. Ignore us at ur peril, we are Kingmakers.
Edit: That’s why you was surprised when Conservative trounced Labours by wide margin at last election, but we was not. What you had failed to factor in, was that the Labour candidate at the time, his eyes were set too close together.
Originally posted by @Bearsy
don’t worry cherts, Ive got ur back. What we’re saying, pappington, is that the Swing Vote bros who decide elections, like i.e. Bears, we don’t bother about party politics & ideaology & policies, or anything like that, we’re Shallow Cocks and vote purely based on what the candidate looks like & to lesser extent, his Rep. Ignore us at ur peril, we are Kingmakers.
In the 150 seats that actually count, perhaps.
I don’t disagree. I’ve been guilty of projection far too often in the past, and now realise, quite correctly, that politics is mostly about convincing stupid people to vote for you. I have spent far too much time pointing out their stupidity and that simply doesn’t help.
Edit: That’s why you was surprised when Conservative trounced Labours by wide margin at last election, but we was not. What you had failed to factor in, was that the Labour candidate at the time, his eyes were set too close together.
Didn’t think Miliband would win outright, but yep, I was surprised.
You can actually distill this into the cartoon that got me banned from TSW. I 100% believe that the picture of Miliband and the bacon sandwich influenced Jamie.
I can’t change that, but I can certainly rise above it, and have a bit of fun mocking intelligent people that can’t.
word. All the political threads on here, they shouldn’t be debating policies etc, they should be discussing which of the candidates look like a nobber, or sounds like a nobber, because that’s what’s important.
Doesn’t this all smack of hypocrisy? People accuse Boris of looking like a scarecrow and ridicule his looks, and even say he has to smarten up if he wants to be a serious PM candidate.
So is it right for one lot and not the other?
Originally posted by @BTripz
Doesn’t this all smack of hypocrisy? People accuse Boris of looking like a scarecrow and ridicule his looks, and even say he has to smarten up if he wants to be a serious PM candidate.
So is it right for one lot and not the other?
I mentioned Boris to highlight Conservative hypocrisy, so yeah, it does a bit.
I think it may have been the first time I’ve ever discussed his appearance (it’s not really a standard attack of mine).
I’m more concerned about having a mateless chump like him get to Number 10, especially after seeing some of his Mayoral meetings.
Put that same bully in Number 10 without the restraints he had in London and we’re asking for trouble, really.
I’m not saying it isn’t, but do you think most people in an election will think like that? I personally don’t.
I’m not talking about me. If he wants to win an election I think that looking like a PM will win him votes.
This is parliament, it’s in front of the public. For that reason he should try to look like a statesman, not a supply teacher.
I’d rather have a PM in a cardigan than in a pig’s mouth.
Remind me which of those pictures was taken in Parliament?
At least his tie is done up properly and he’s wearing a nice expensive suit. Whether he is off his face and can concentrate. Who cares?
Presumably Gideon was wondering whether his brother was fucking one of his vulnerable patients again or supplying drugs to prostitutes that day.
Or perhaps he was thinking about how he could explain his own unusual arrangement with Google.
A couple of years out of date now but sums up the situation at the time quite nicely, I think. I wonder what SL thinks of Corbyn. He’s got a new series coming out so I’ll guess we’ll find out soon enough.
