Itâs a very misleading article, but what would you expect from the state propaganda machine. 20 interviews with May, whilst ch4, 5 and many others get refused a single one(democracy at itâs finest).
This is what Putin said.
âHe was simply a spy. A traitor to the motherland. There is such a concept â a traitor to the motherland. He was one of those.
âHeâs simply a scumbag, thatâs all.â
Doesnât sound quite so threatening like that. I could imagine at least one person on here, that would echo that sentiment, if it was a traitor to Britain. But they do it continuously through the whole thing.
" It was sprayed from a modified perfume bottle that was later picked up and given to Dawn Sturgess, who died in July, they say.â
This would be the same bottle that was sealed in wrapped box and shattered by Charlie, but miraculously reassembled itself?
âone of the men was subsequently identified by an investigative website as Colonel Anatoliy Chepigaâ
A clear lie. There has been no identification and no official endorsement, just a dodgy site that has been shown to lie on numerous occasions. Didnât all the msm warn us about believing these kind of sites?
SOS will think it is rubbish, even with all the news today of expulsions and hacking, he still hasnât touched down with reality.
Iâve just followed through in laughter, SOS has the audacity to say a âdodgyâ site where his all come from reputable places like redneck Arizona and conspiracy laden MontanaâŚ
The Russians obviously
Iâm on O2 and my phone is working fine. Clearly theyâr looking after their own - eh, Baz?
Howâs the blood pressure Barry?
Hereâs what to look for concerning propaganda and attacks based on it.
1.based on allegations of dramatic new evidence
2.communicated with high emotional intensity and moral outrage
3.apparently supported by an informed corporate media/academic/expert consensus
4.reinforced by damning condemnation of anyone daring even to question the apparent consensus
5.characterised by tragicomic moral dissonance
You or me?
Anyone officially endorsed bellendcat?
Little Gavin did, but was slapped down by those that know better. Why was that?
Kind of on topic:
So you donât think Russia has done this?
You never answer questions, just ignore and then repeat oneâs youâve already asked.
So in the same spirit, do you and why?
So are the Russians responsible for me still getting O2 while everyone else seems to have experienced a crashed network?
Itâs as good a conspiracy theory as youâve managed to come up with isnât it?
Maybe the Russkiâs are just playing by our rules?:
Iâve no conspiracy theory, I just believe in common sense,
The Russians interfered in the US elections and got Trump elected or wanted him elected and helped.
Theyâve attacked institutions via the internet.
They allow and authorise state sanctioned killings.
The also allow illegal invasions on sovereign nations.
This is hardly unknown nor controversial, other than to comrade SOS, the enemy withinâŚ
Now turn it on its head and try to think as if you were a Russian citizen- donât you think they believe the west are doing something similar?
Now, if you think they are deluded, then what does that say about your arguments? They are the exact mirror image.
I thought this was common knowledge rather than new news, but good point.
Iâve always thought that our âsecretâ services were just as bad as the other side.
Thatâs probably where my distrust and distaste for the âestablishmentâ originally comes from tbh.
I donât think itâs been admitted in court before though.
Bellendcat will soon tell us the name of the second tourist. Heâs had a dream that it will drop in his inbox like magic(probably Friday, but you know dreams, they faid so fast, he wasnât sure).
Anyone that can guess it in advance, will be locked up as an obvious Putin nazi(that or a witch).
They canât deny theyâve invaded Crimea.
They arenât as free as we are no matter how Goat or SOS states, its not a democratic nation for a start, but thats another issue, you disagree with the Netherlands? Other EU nations?
Back to quoting the Guardian as it has something you agree with?
Agree with? Itâs an article about a court case.