Have you done the odds yet Barry?
You question everything other than what you believe, do you believe Putin?
At the moment I am questioning why a blogger and former knicker salesman is churning out all this info through bellingcat and yet our intelligence agencies couldnât find a bottle of perfume on a kitchen worktop for 2 weeks.
2 Likes
I donât believe anyone until thereâs good evidence and our lots story would be laughed out a court(as far as weâve seen).
Why would i believe Putin or anyone else? Facts/evidence are what make all but the gullible believe and iâm not seeing much, especially from our side. I am seeing a lot of pre judging and out and out propaganda, which is always a worry(thatâs normally reserved for war).
Show a balanced, questioning report in any of msm since this farce began?
1 Like
Russian criminals live here because of the money to be made on the traditionally strong pound - itâs why we have a lot of Russian mafia sniffing around over the years.
Whoâs kitchen worktop?
Now look at rules that let them in. Weâre a gangster state for the rich.
Edit: sorry, forgot, on subject, look at the visas the criminals we allow in, can get their couriers/security. Thatâs were people might want to look concerning these two.
1 Like
Youâre quick to judge this Country when it suits, and Trump, but just not Trump and Putin together, hypocrite.
And? What you trying to prove here?
You need proof, thats what you were saying a minute ago, talk some shite you.
I know this ainât gonna popular (not least with Barry), but I have to agree with Barry here.
What proof do you want @Saint-or-sinner , that they did it? What proof would you be happy with?
If the Russians were so sure of their innocence, why wonât they extradite them?
There are lots more and lots more of these on your shitehouse tinfoil head sites as well.
There has been no proof at all, so at the moment, any would be a good start. There isnât any released proof that a so called Novichok was used(read the report, both of them), just lots and lots of propaganda and ever changing stories. Look at it like a lawyer for the accused.
Read the Russian constitution for the answer to your last question. But also look at it like their lawyer. Think theyâll get a fair trial, or already been found guilty?
Iâm with you on that one.
Dr David Kelly?
The odds are still massively against you.
Iraq?
I agree with Kelly as well but where is the proof?
You simply donât like the UK mate, youâre in the wrong Country comrade.
Do you think weâll ever see any real proof Bazza? Of either Kellyâs death or the Salisbury/Amesbury incidents? Will we ever truly know?
1 Like
So therefore why do you discount Russia so easily when theyâve killed before like say the UK?
Its biased and quite frankly agenda driven bollocks.
So there are multiple things here.
Firstly, as Iâve said over and over along, the full prosecution proof would not be released - itâs like leaving a list of answers on a fucking exam table.
Iâm not going to read the Russian constitution, so enlighten me please?
I thought the independent body had said that it was most likely Novichok was used, and that their Foreign Minister was talking shit.
Why wouldnât they get a fair trial? Thereâs a whole load of fucking brainless morons in this country that have never even heard of Salisbury, let alone Novichok, that they could have on a jury. Either way, if youâre saying they canât have a fair trial, but also believe in innocent until proven guilty, then there is no point discussing this anymore, as no-one will ever prove one way or the other.
Now, can you please tell me what proof you need?
I havenât discounted Russia. I have stated that they are likely to be behind the use of this nerve agent. I have also said that this whole thing is fishy as fuck.
3 Likes
I bet this would all have gone quiet had Corbyn been Prime Minister.