So to gauge racism in this country, donât look at the racists?
Seems a weird way of going about things.
Let me get this straight.
You are using the Home Office, who are literally responsible for deporting people, and is presently run by Priti Patel, one of the nastiest pieces of work in politics, as a yardstick for how racist the country is?
Fucking mental. Iâm glad some managed to get a cheap laugh out of it. Donât expect anyone serious to take that view seriously.
Not sure how you got there from my question, but whatever.
You made a statement on how you say we should look at it. I disagree as it doesnât address the subject.
Nothing about the HO in my post.
Because I explicitly said âThe Home Office have always been cuntsâ
I think if anyone has gone off on a tangent, itâs you. Again.
You might want to learn to read English. The cunts at the Home Office kick people out for that sort of thing,
Your deliberately misleading yourself there.
You said
And I think my reply makes it obvious this was what i was raising issue with.
Iâm sorry if that confused you.
Anyway back to the point that you seem to want to avoid.
How does looking at
Tell us anything about the racists?
As I said
Or to put it another way, how do you
By deliberately avoiding the pulse of the racists?
That seems like trying to diagnose a sick patient by looking at a healthy patient.
Weâve got a quote facility, which judging from this tiresome bollocks, you know how to use. Stop arguing points people havenât made.
The original claim was that Britain is the least racist country in the world.
The problem with counting up the racists is that dunderheads like yourself include everyone that doesnât fucking agree with you in that camp.
India is the most racist country I have experienced.
HTH
1 Like
Their Caste system is something else
2 Likes
When youâve still got an active caste system where people within a race discriminate against themselves just because of an accident of birth, that really doesnât surprise me.
And thatâs before we even get around to Hindu opinions on Muslims or Sikhs.
I worked with an Indian Muslim once and asked him what the score was with cows.
âI just donât bother eating any meat. Far too much hassleâ
1 Like
Well i donât think he has said that he has been shagging blokes. But he has said that he knew he was gay when he got married, 27 years ago. So unless you are extremely naive i think we can take it as read that he has shagged a few blokes. The only torment is his probable terror that the young lad he has been grooming since he was 15, and known since he was 10, is becoming public knowledge. There is clearly a damage limitation control going on by the media luvvies to protect him. I suspect more than a few of them will end up with egg on their faces in the coming days, they will wish they had kept their mouths shut. In his interview with the fragrant Holly(butter wouldnât melt in my mouth) Willoughby she specifically asked him, " lets make it quite clear, you have been under no pressure to come out as gay"? Which is clearly a blatant lie. I just feel sorry for the lad, who has been thrown under the bus, Schofield has clearly been grooming this lad since he was a schoolboy. Just imagine if a middle aged man, prominent on TV, had been caught bang to rights grooming a 15 year old girl, all hell would have broken loose. This boy, (because thatâs what he is), has been thrown to the wolves, he was clearly extremely pissed off that as soon as Schofield got bored with him he was demoted from being his âpersonal assistantâ and shuffled off back to being a runner on Loose Women. Apparently it is common knowledge that Schofield has form when it comes to âmentoringâ young lads that want a career in the business, it is also common knowledge apparently by his peers that he was gay, cheating on his wife and had been for years. But he is a ânational treasureâ, so must be protected. John Leslie had his career ruined after Ulrika Jonson made allegations about him touching her up, he was immediately persona non grata. Even though the fragrant Ulrika was known as a bit of a sport, pretty much went through the Premiership, (although she drew the line at Paul Scholes, understandable). The only reason Phillip Schofield has made this, carefully choreographed coming out, is to try and limit the damage. It just pisses me off that because it is a gay thing he gets a free pass, like he is some kind of brave hero for admitting that he has been cheating on his wife with for decades, having sex with men. A nonce is a nonce, regardless of their sexual orientation. But it appears that a heterosexual nonce is beyond the pale, but a same sex one is some kind of victim, and anyone who challenges this is somehow homophobic. That is the first card out of the deck to shut it down.
2 Likes
We do.
I do.
Iâm not.
You definitely said
So what, you made a separate claim.
No one counted or ask anyone else to. You just made the whole thing up and sprinkled it with a bit of school playground abuse.
If you canât reason out YOUR claim, i wouldnât adviise abuse. Your rather shit at it.
Mate, you could have a fight in an empty room - and yes, I know itâs me saying this. I really canât be arsed defending things that exist only in your imagination.
Iâd say well done on the brilliant piece of forum shithousery, but Iâm afraid youâll just quote me.
Enjoy your diminishing pool of conversation pals on these threads.
You could of just answered the question(you still can. Canât you?) and not gone through the lies and name calling routine.
But yeah, itâs all my fault 
Fucking well said. I canât disagree with a word of that, and if ever proof were needed that there is a âgay mafiaâ cabal operating within the media, well the Schofield case (and I hope it does actually become a case) ought to stand as testament to it.
2 Likes
It appears a judge has granted Schofield an injunction thereby banning any reporting of his relationship with the lad Matthew McGreevy. Another classic example of rich influential people who are up to no good being protected by the establishment. I would love to see this judgeâs reasoning as to why a middle aged man grooming a 15 year old boy should be kept secret from the general public. Whoâs interests does he think he is serving?
2 Likes
Quite simply, because you canât have trial by (social) media. Schofield may be a nonce, but itâs not for anyone other than the due legal process to charge and convict him.
6 Likes
Yep. His defence would immediately claim that the trial was biased against him because of social media speculation, regardless of his innocence or guilt.
Hasnât stopped anyone before.
1 Like
What the fucks going on? 
British man sleeping on streets in Europe after being blocked from entering UK
1 Like
One of ours from 79-82