Again Barry, i said, itâs up to the Syrian people and their government to decide. None of our business and we need to get all illegal foreigners that we finance out.
Iâm still struggling to understand the thought process of someone that can describe the razing of Raqqa and ensuing humanitarian crisis like this.
Just the one. Are you sure about that?
Poor?
Wreckless or executed as planned?
Unjustified? Certainly, as weâre there illegally.
Action? Funny way to describe it.
As to the rest, give me a full list of approved sources(or unapproved, whichever is shorter).
Or you could find something out for yourself.
Have funđ
It is an answer.
Their choice, how they deal with our payed up jihadists. Completely their choice, how they deal with the problem we forced on them.
Guess the top 5 countries, hoping they do exactly what we done to Raqqa(Russia isnât one of them).
That will be for others to sort out but bombing the shit out of a place isnât going to help, the Russians are probably doing it to save face as the Assad would wipe them all out, you canât have any credibility as an international player if you simply obliterate.
Iâm still waiting for your list of approved sources. Whatâs taking so long?
Iâll take a stab in the dark and assume youâre ok with bbc(you use them a lot).
The government has suspended a foreign aid project after a BBC Panorama investigation found taxpayersâ cash was being diverted to extremists in Syria.
A UK government spokesman said it takes allegations of co-operation with terrorist groups âextremely seriouslyâ.
I await your defence of âone poor wreckless unjustified actionâ yer again. How many years now?