Yes, I fucking am.
You could just use it, but, how can I put this?
Itās a little tainted.
Itās like lending some underwear to a mate. You donāt ask for it back.
Hughes admitting that weāre shit with 3 at the backā¦ although I think heās going to persist until we get it right (which could well be a problem)
We just allowed them too many opportunities where we didnāt get our system right,ā added Hughes. āThe three centre halves maybe needed a little bit more clarity. Once we went to a back four we needed to defend correctly.
āWe havenāt had a lot of time working with the three lads, itās only been three or four weeks and at times you saw they were maybe a little bit at odds in terms of who would engage and who would drop off and we got that wrong on a couple of occasions.
What concerns me about that is that he hasnāt identified that the problems with 3 at the back are the space it leaves in midfield if we have 2 up front, the dearth of goals if we have one upfront, the fact the team moves as 3 individual units instead of as one and fact that neither our right or left back (despite their reputations) like playing box to box to make the formation work.
The last bit of this is the most important I reckon.
Your fullbacks have to be right on their game for 3-5-2 to be effective. That hasnāt been the case for more than a season.
The new Darren Powell!!