Descriptions of IS as mere criminals, psychopaths, uneducated religious fanatics etc are complacently simplistic: the psychology driving their appeal, especially their appeal to young people, is, disturbingly, far more complex, imo
The debate as to how our 21st century world has arrived at a situation whereby people dismiss fellow humans as infidels or apostates before inflicting unspeakable atrocities upon them is an interesting one; but far more pertinent, and probably more difficult, is the debate as to where the fuck we go from here.
Any belief that the non-IS world can rationalise with, negotiate with, or in anyway appease IS is naive to the point of absurdity, imo.
To do nothing - i.e. allow IS to gain ever more territory unopposed - is an unpalatable option, especially for those not prescribing to IS’s doctrines, which, of course, includes millions of neighbouring Muslims, many, many of whom have already been mercilessly slaughtered by IS.
Increasing the rate of air strikes serves to increase the rate of new IS recruits. Adopting isolationist policies - closing borders etc. - will, almost certainly, ultimately, serve likewise.
Increasing arms supplies and other support to neighbouring armies or militias has proved in the past to be problematic - to put it mildly.
Sending Western ground troops is exactly what IS wants: it has been prophesied and will signify the beginning stages of The Apocalypse, apparently. Whether or not that proves to be the case, it’s impossible to imagine anything other than bloody carnage.
In short, it’s all a miserable, depressing, brain-fuck.
Thank heavens it’s Friday.
This is an interesting read, imo - albeit quite long and written in March
Edit: I’ve just realised it’s only Thursday, ffs.