Labour leadership race - Corbyn elected leader

Seems a fair summary to me, Dennis. Worried?

1 Like

If you take American hegemony and NATO membership as immutable concepts.

Which I know you do :laughing:

A BRITISH political party, founded over 100 years ago by socialists is ‘being infiltrated by socialists’, it has been claimed.

The Labour Party, started in 1900 by self-confessed socialist Keir Hardie, has seen a ‘suspiciously large influx’ of people who believe a lot of the same things as he did.

A senior Labour official said: “These people are clearly very interested in politics, but for some reason they haven’t joined the Conservative Party. It would appear they are really into redistribution of wealth, nationalisation and the welfare state. It’s all very sinister.”

:laughing:

That’s very good!

“Also, I was a member from 1981 until 1994. At that point I decided it wasn’t really for me anymore. Something must have happened.”

I thought all you Corbynites were above personal attacks. I’m neither in favour of American ‘hegemony’ nor NATO membership.

Nor am I a Blair supporter, as I’ve made clear many times. However, if you write Blair out of history, that makes the last ‘proper’ Labour leader to lead the party to electoral victory was Harold Wilson in 1976.

If that’s not perceived as a problem by Corbynites, then I despair.

1 Like

It’s not really personal, more of an assessment of where you might have agreed with the author. I think we’ve certainly disagreed in the past on NATO, although I may be wrong on that front. Regardless, you termed the piece a fair summary, which included some hit slosh on how Corbyn would do the unthinkable and potentially leave the alliance.

Personally, I’m not entirely sure about NATO in the present day. Putin makes the point that the key decision maker in Europe doesn’t have a border with an EU country. That’s grandstanding, of course - and who knows what kind of pressure Russia might exert without NATO reining it in. I suspect that’s a large part of why it still exists.

It’s a shame that the EU is in the state it is in. Strong, democratic leadership may have put the EU in a position where it could have said “we’ll handle our own defence, ta”, potentially allowing relations with Russia to normalise. That’s never really going to be possible with the US in the mix. They seem to want to keep a division of some kind, if only to be the gatekeeper between the two parts of the world.

Originally posted by @pap

http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/politics/politics-headlines/party-founded-by-keir-hardie-being-infiltrated-by-socialists-20150813101079?utm_campaign=shareaholic&utm_medium=facebook&utm_source=socialnetwork

A BRITISH political party, founded over 100 years ago by socialists is ‘being infiltrated by socialists’, it has been claimed.

The Labour Party, started in 1900 by self-confessed socialist Keir Hardie, has seen a ‘suspiciously large influx’ of people who believe a lot of the same things as he did.

A senior Labour official said: “These people are clearly very interested in politics, but for some reason they haven’t joined the Conservative Party. It would appear they are really into redistribution of wealth, nationalisation and the welfare state. It’s all very sinister.”

:laughing:

I read that as Socialite then…

Well I’m having an ironic dig about the ‘personal’. I just find this ‘we don’t do personal’ line incredibly holier-than-thou, especially when it’s used against those who challenge Corbyn’s policies.

We’ve never had a disagreement about NATO. My own position is that a defence force should be part of a democratised EU.

But what about the wider question of actually getting into power (which Corbynites love to dodge, as if it’s somehow beneath them)? If Harold Wilson was the last ‘true’ Labour leader to actually win an election, that means we’re heading for 40 years without an approved brand of Labourism. Given that Ed Miliband lost the election badly on a left-centre ticket nowhere near as radical as Corbyn’s, how much wilderness is too much?

1 Like

I find the way people talk about Blair on here, very strange.

1 Like

Honestly think that if Corbyn wins, all bets are off when it comes to what happens next. I liked what DeppoInExile said on Twitter. The people who are telling you he can’t win an election are people that can’t win a Labour leadership race. Says it all.

Personally, I think he’s the only one who stands a chance of getting elected at a general election.

1 Like

This seems to back up your thoughts Pap

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2015/08/14/jeremy-corbyn-would-win-more-votes-at-general-election-poll-finds_n_7989800.html?1439583225

Now that is interesting, hoofinruth.

I hadn’t considered that angle.

Still don’t think he’s got (much of) a chance, but interesting that he might have the best chance.

The rather glaring problem with it, Bletch, is that not all subjects of polls actually vote.

Perhaps the most cretinous intervention in the last election was Russell Brand’s ‘don’t vote’ call. While it may not have been causal, by far the lowest voting demographic were the newly enfranchised 18-25 year olds. They needed to be encouraged to vote, not told it didn’t matter. One good thing to do with Corbyn’s campaign is that he seems to have attracted large numbers of this group and he isn’t likely (I hope) to take the same line.

Certainly someone needs to bring them back into the voting arena. Look what’s happened since. The age and social class groups who voted in the greatest numbers found their state perks protected (higher pensions, release from inheritance tax). The (relative) non-voters, by contrast, have been, and are about to be, absolutely hammered.

So if the same sorts of people vote in the ways they did last time, absolutely nothing changes, and the young and poor(er) will take the hit again.

3 Likes

I’d love to quiz you about it Lou, but I’ve tried before and we didn’t get too far.

I saw this on FB today; not one of mine.

Blair was best president we ever had. I remember one time when he was still president, i think it was towards the end of his career, he appeared on Football Focus as studio guest. It was slightly strange, cos he was kind of out of his element, and breathing v.heavily in a slightly panicky way, like he was worried they were gonna trip him up with their high-level questioning.

“Who is your favourite player?” asked I dunno Maniche or Dan Walker, or Gary Lineker, or whoever it was at the time.

“Malbranque,” said Tony Blair.

I done a little LOL. Steed Malbranque? Of Fulham? But then, right, Malbranque went out that day and scored two goals. I mean, prob blair had the match fixed by MI5, but it was still pretty cool. Legend.

1 Like

I will one day Pap!

I wouldn’t bother Lou, pap & his Facebook correspondants are v.confused & don’t understand politics at all. You can’t blame Blair for Iraq war! Blair was just President, which is like being the front man of a boyband, his job was to do TV performances & shake hands with i.e. George Bush & things like that. He’s not the music producer, or record label! The decisions about what wars we do are made by i.e. the White House.

Free Tony Blair, you commie bastards!

1 Like

Quit taking the piss, Bearsy!

I’m not i love tony blair I’m srs!

This is why I voted for him.

Spot the look on the smug tunc’s face as he turns away.

Grinning, he thinks to himself, “I will be able to do anything now. Anything. ANYTHING. Mmmmmmwwwwahahahahahaha, MMMMMwwwwahahahahahaha…”

2 Likes