The evidence was presented to the IAAF before the 2012 London Olympics and they didn’t have the balls to act upon it. As a consequence the London Olympics were a sham.
- Revealed many instances of inadequate testing and poor compliance around testing standards.
- Suggested that neither the Russian athletics federation (Araf) the Russian anti-doping agency (Rusada), nor the Russian Federation can be considered anti-doping code-compliant.
- Recommended that Wada withdraw its accreditation of the Moscow laboratory as soon as possible and advocated the permanent removal of its director Grigory Rodchenko, whom it accuses of asking for and accepting bribes and intentionally destroying samples he was told to keep.
- Confirmed allegations that some Russian doctors and/or laboratory personnel acted as enablers for systematic cheating along with athletics coaches.
- Identified the intentional and malicious destruction of more than 1,400 samples by Moscow laboratory officials after receiving written notification from Wada to preserve target samples.
- Said that Russian security service FSB were present at the Moscow and Sochi labs and that this was part of a wider pattern of “direct intimidation and interference by the Russian state with the Moscow laboratory operations.”
- Found that Rusada gave athletes advance notice of tests, hid missed tests, bullied doping control officers and their families and took bribes to cover up missed tests.
- Found that a number of Russian athletes suspected of doping could have been prevented from competing at the London 2012 Olympics had it not been for “the collective and inexplicable laissez-faire policy” adopted by the IAAF and the Russian athletics federation.
- Found that Russian law enforcement was involved in efforts to “interfere with integrity of samples”.
- Found evidence of multiple rules breaches by IAAF officials and found the governing body to be “inexplicably lax in following up suspicious blood (and other) profiles”.