Has the Brexit argument been effectively won so

‘’… financial stability only works if you ignore reality after 2008’’

Well it woudl be rude not to point out that

a) this all began becaus of banking practices and loans in the US - the same US we are told is a better trade partner by some…

b) it was also in part driven by the more relaxed financial legislation in the UK as a result of UK Government, NOT EU Government - which is one of the reasons we have so many of these greedy fuckers in the UK in the first place…

c) Germans fucking Greece - well given the fact that the Germans only paid off their post war loans form US and UK at stupid interest in the late 80s, not sure we can make a big fuss about this. The fact the Germans were able to avctually pay it off in 35 years or so was more down to their graft… not through some mates rates deal and it dwarfs the Greek situation… OK different era, but you get the point.

Dude, if you can be a flagrantly ‘flexible’ with emotive sensationalist statements and ‘functional dictatorships’ - you have to offer the same courtesy to the opposition without critique…or are will we be subjected to a 80’s Pravda like rebuke?

Originally posted by @areloa-grandee

So pap, when are you going to storm the House of lords - afterall its a form of functional dictatorship , unelected and unaccountavble to the British public… or maybe a better comparison is the UK Civil Service - Unelected beurocrats, wasteful, inefficient etc…

Couple of things.

  1. Immigration policy - the issue of capacity re public services is total bollox… with respect to NHS, given we have some 7-9% of NHS stafff from the EU, their taxation contribution is less than the cost of providing health care to EU migrants… I will say again, comoditizing people in trems of skills and points to fulfill quotas is simply wrong - success for migrants should be down to their comittment and hard work, not how many points they score…

Capacity is an issue across the board. I’ve just been watching yesterday’s PMQs. Gordon Brown, for all his faults, introduced a Migrant Impact Fund aimed at reducing stresses on local economies particularly affected by migration. The Tories abolished it.

It’s not just the NHS. It’s the demand on the housing market, schools, translation services, depression of wages for working people to the point where they need to be renumerated by the government.

I have zero problem with unlimited migration if the money is there to build the infrastructure. It isn’t, that wasn’t the deal that Cameron brought back, therefore it is a concern.

And for all the tax neutral or positive assessments that economists produce, few of them will measure what has been lost in the process, such as a living wage, or the vast sums paid out in Housing Benefit to landlords enjoying a low supply market.

  1. Workers rights - we already sadly have a diluted version of the protection afforded to EU workers. The rights we have have been down to EU legislation and do you really believe that a UK Government that will inevitably lurch to the right is going to give a fuck about protecting rights of workers that was developed by the EU?

Complete shit, I’m afraid.

TUC general secretary Frances O’Grady claimed, “It’s the EU that guarantees workers paid holidays, parental leave and equal treatment of part-timers.”

In reality, it was the unions that O’Grady leads that won those rights.

Their struggles mean that some British workplace legislation, such as health and safety, is stronger than the EU demands.

The Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 came out of a mass upsurge in union struggle that toppled Edward Heath’s Tory government.

It’s been under relentless Tory attack. But the EU’s “Better Regulation” agenda won’t give workers more protection. It makes clear that “suppressing unnecessary administrative burdens” is crucial for business.


The Equal Pay Act, which formally guarantees equal pay, had nothing to with the EU. A Labour government introduced it in 1970 after women machinists at Ford’s Dagenham plant in east London went on all-out strike.

The Equal Pay Act is now largely superseded by the Equality Act of 2010—legislation that would remain after a “Brexit”.

Much of EU employment law has also been implemented through British legislation, and is often stronger than the EU requires. For instance, the EU’s minimum annual holiday period is four weeks, yet in Britain it’s 5.6 weeks.

EU directives on maternity leave guard against some discrimination and all women are entitled to

14 weeks’ leave. But parents in Britain can qualify for up to 50 weeks of shared leave, 37 of which are paid.

https://socialistworker.co.uk/art/42434/Six+myths+about+the+European+Union

Just this year, the Conservatives have attempted to attack workers’ rights through the Trade Union Bill. It was Labour that opposed that. The EU did nothing.

As has been repeatedly said: there is a fuck load wrong with the EU. Including elements that are undemocratic and possibly in places, worse… but to think that Leave will improve the rights of people is naive at best.

Leave is a campaign to get the UK out of the EU. It is not a government. Businesses will continue to try to attempt erode workers rights. Ironically, the EU, what with its unelected executive, is the ideal place to dispense such policies.

We can vote out governments that create policy we don’t like in general elections. This is our one chance to _offer an opinion _on whether we want that level of unaccountable control sitting over us.

If the British people really believe in all that is good about Britain, our sense of fairplay, decency and rights… then lets go back to a bit of good old fashioned emperalist justification… lets get these jumped up Eurocrats to play by our rules… by forcing through change - You dont run away from something because its shit… you stand up and fight for change, highlight what is shit and LEAD the change from within - however slowly it is, nothing worth it every came easy.

The UK has been hugely influential in the EU, just not in ways that many of its citizens would find attractive. We have been instrumental in creating many of the business friendly regulations. We have been praised by our European centre right colleagues for bringing market principles in.

Unfortunately, the UK has been led by Thatcherite principles since 1979.

If out MEPs are not doing this, then lets take their selection more fucking seriously and make them accountable.

An MEPs job is to make a little speech, then say yes or no on an issue.

That’s it. They don’t direct any legislation. They just get to sign off on law the unelected EU commission creates.

But ultimately, I still cant get away form the sad fact that for many this decision will be driven by the fear of migrants… of the country being ‘overwhelmed’ by freeloaders or those steeling our jobs… well you cant have it both ways, because if some of the bollox is to believed we should just stay in as the EU will make sure all our jobs go abroad so there will be no incentive for migrants to come here anyway… a facetious comment maybe, but there it shows the idiotic contradictions in some the rhetoric spouted.

Leave and IMHO, we throw away our chance to drivers of change… and we will be making a symbolic statement about our view on migration that I find hard to stomach… am I wrong to focus on this one issue, whne its the one that I suspect the majority of LEAVES will be using to justify their perspective?

Remain and IMHO, we validate this corrupt enterprise and set it in stone, waiting for the miracle of a centre-left government in affluent Germany before any genuine reform is possible, while a far right party makes huge gains in France, despite all attempts to stop it.

There’s no implied statement about migration. That’s a guilt trip I refuse to go on, although many will fall for it.

Originally posted by @Rallyboy

And if we were being specific I would probably say I am for remain and reform.

As I said in a previous post, we’ve been reforming, just in a specific direction.

I don’t see how you push through the kind of reform you need when the key players are centre-right, and quite happy with that, and quite happy to dump on places like Greece.

With the financial system so deeply intertwined in the creation and direction of policy, what chance does the EU have of making the leftward shift it needs?

To me, Leave looks like the road to nowhere - and with a 50:50 potential for disastrous consequences.

It’s probably a good a time as any to reiterate that we’re not the only country that wants to leave. We’re the only country getting asked, and even then, it isn’t legally binding.

If we vote Leave and the EU makes a counter-offer with democratic reform, I’ll reconsider my position. Reform is far less likely if we say “that’s alright, skip. on you go” (oh, and make sure the kids of working EU migrants get less money to live on than British ones for four years).

Pap… there has been more recent legislation than 1970… I do know about Dagenham… even seen the film… you dont mention the Working time directives for example… which means my colleagues in France can go home at 5 and I am doing 60 hour plus weeks…

As I amnd many have said… both sides can call on selected FACTs that present pros and cons, becayuse some things seem good, other shit. The Reamins on here seem capable of acknowledging this on these issues.

MEPs ‘‘sign off on laws the unelected commission creates’’ yes or no… well what is it?, either they have no power to say no or they do, and if signing off on laws the EU commission creates, then this is no diferent to the the civils who work on white papers for the Commons and Lords to vote on… your statement lacks any factual basis, what is your source or is it merely opinion?

Finally the immigration card IS a fucking emotive issue. IT IS imporatnt to play this card because the LEAVE vote will be heavily driven by this issue. NOt you maybe but many voiting leave will be doing so on this issue alone, so it is incrediby imporatnt that those who actively support an open migration policy point out this fact.

Sorry Pap, you cant ignore it simply because your views on democracy issues mean you are for LEAVE… that’s both weak and exactly what you tried to accuse me of the other day - I suggest YOU go read some Max Frisch. Its not abut making you feel guilty its about making you THINK and include this issue when forming an opinion because its fucking important.

You dont want to consider it, because you know its makes you feel uneasy, you are a decent bloke, not some ignorant cunt and so the ideas presented by those who want to shut our borders sit uneasy with you as well…

We’ve got some of the worst working conditions in living memory. Zero hours contracts. Workfare, which has an impact on those seeking paid work, or those seeking overtime.

People going out to do a full week’s work, and still not being able to make ends meet.

Where is the EU in all of this?

Oh aye, secretly negotiating the likes of TTIP to make all of this worse :lou_sunglasses:

Naughty comment, of course, but seriously, where has this guardian of workers’ rights been as ours have been put on the bonfire?

… I would add Pap, to share with you how important this issue is to me. If the Leave campaign can out and said that their only gripe is the bloated autocratic nature of the EU, and there would be NO change to existing policy on migration, in fact they would ensure a fairer policy, then I would probably vote leave, even though I like the concept of Unity the EU represents because of its failure to live up those ideals,

I say probably,because I still believe you dont run away from things that are shit - you lead change… no matter how hard or improbable, you erode injustices thorugh example. Not by walking away… it might take a fucking long time as we saw with US civil rights and Apartheid… but these injsutices were eventually crushed because those that knew waht was right stuck at it. Emotional BS? Yep, but the same principles apply. You stand up to what is wrong and drive change…

All correct, because we did not sign up to better… exempted form most of the more protective elements

Originally posted by @areloa-grandee

… I would add Pap, to share with you how important this issue is to me. If the Leave campaign can out and said that their only gripe is the bloated autocratic nature of the EU, and there would be NO change to existing policy on migration, in fact they would ensure a fairer policy, then I would probably vote leave, even though I like the concept of Unity the EU represents because of its failure to live up those ideals,

So basically, you’d vote Leave if it weren’t for all those people voting Leave for different reasons?

There would be no change to the existing policy on migration. We would no longer be EU citizens. EU citizens would no longer be able to live and work here automatically.

The exact same principle applies every time a political union comes apart. The Scottish would have been subject to those rules had they voted out of the UK, and somehow not gotten into the EU.

As it goes, I do think we need a change in either or migration policy or salaried payments, or both. The threshold we currently place on non-EU migrants is a salary of 34K. That threshold needs to come down, or we’ll miss out on people we need. Alternatively, we could pay 34K for essential jobs.

I say probably,because I still believe you dont run away from things that are shit - you lead change… no matter how hard or improbable, you erode injustices thorugh example. Not by walking away… it might take a fucking long time as we saw with US civil rights and Apartheid… but these injsutices were eventually crushed because those that knew waht was right stuck at it. Emotional BS? Yep, but the same principles apply. You stand up to what is wrong and drive change…

That’s what many people will be doing on June 23rd. They just see a different path to leading that change. People said we’d face economic ruin for leaving the ERM, not joining the Eurozone. They were wrong on both those counts.

As I said before, I do think this is as much an appeal to personality as it is to ideology. You should not be surprised that I have the confidence in Britain that I do. I think that for many, confidence is what it boils down to.

The Leavers are confident that getting out before it gets too hot is the best course of action. The Remainers think staying in is the only way we’ll survive.

‘‘So basically, you’d vote Leave if it weren’t for all those people voting Leave for different reasons?’’

NO. Pleae dont assume/make up stuff

I am voting Remain because of the I believe it is better for our migration policy and more reflective of my principles as a result.

The democracy/autocracy, financial issues are abiguous at best as what will provide a better future - we have seen ‘data’ and evidence presented from both sides at times compelling as it is bullshit… as for sovereignty, not something that was ever an issue for given my view of the artificail nature and irrelvence in terms of geological time anyway.

I don’t think they felt very ambiguous in Greece.

A friend who places conditions on that friendship and who makes threats to get their own way, is, in my opinion, no friend at all.

The German finance minister has bullied the Greeks in the past and is now turning his gun sights on us. Why? Not because he is concerned about our welfare and future prosperity, but because it suits the Germans.

2 Likes

Pap. did you care so much about the Greek’s economy and their folks lot, before their economic collapse? They benefitted hugely from EU rula development funding through their membership. The situtaion now is hideous, but you have to accept that the conditions created by the gloabl economic collapse in 2006 was not unique, and not the doing of the EU… Yes there should be better ways to help this situation now, but how will we ensure tehre are by being removed form it? If you have a genuine concern for the Greeks, as you seem to suggest, voting leave will remove us from any influence in how the EU manages this going forward…

Seriously CB, what does this mean? its just a sentance that is made up, ‘‘becaus it suits the Germans’’ why? tell me why and how it suits the Germans if making such a statement. Explain whyi t might be in their interest and not in ours, otherwise its just BS, no?

I read a good article on this recently, I will have a mooch to see if I can find it again

I don’t want to be friends with them!

I want what is best for us, and if that means smiling sweetly at the bully and biding your time, that is the clever way to deal with it.

Storming out and leading a lonely existence may sound like a grand dramatic gesture at the time, but the novelty could wear off.

We need to be clever and I personally think that working from within a cruise liner, where you do have influence, is better than thrashing about in your own inflatable wearing a captain’s hat.

1 Like

Fair enough… although then I will press you on who wrote it,their data sources and whether there is any bias in eiether direction within it :lou_lol: :lou_surprised:

Originally posted by @areloa-grandee

Pap… there has been more recent legislation than 1970… I do know about Dagenham… even seen the film… you dont mention the Working time directives for example… which means my colleagues in France can go home at 5 and I am doing 60 hour plus weeks…

You must have opted out of the Working Time Directive then.

You can’t work more than 48 hours a week on average - normally averaged over 17 weeks. This law is sometimes called the ‘working time directive’ or ‘working time regulations’.

You can choose to work more by opting out of the 48-hour week.

If you’re under 18, you can’t work more than 8 hours a day or 40 hours a week.

Exceptions

You may have to work more than 48 hours a week on average if you work in a job:

where 24-hour staffing is required

in the armed forces, emergency services or police

in security and surveillance

as a domestic servant in a private household

as a seafarer, sea-fisherman or worker on vessels on inland waterways

where working time is not measured and you’re in control, eg you’re a managing executive with control over your decisions

I do my own research!

I’ve been out in the middle of Southampton Water all week in an inflatable, wearing my little Captain’s hat - let me tell you, it wasn’t fun!

Hop on board the Titanic! We’ve got a shiny chandelier!

2 Likes

Indeed, because we had no choice really…