Originally posted by @areloa-grandee
To Pap and JS - Yes I can accept that Governmental and institutional powers can’ influence certain distasteful incidents… BUT, I think there is a difference between them then sweeping historic (70sand 80s) allegations under the carpert… versus, the possibilty of child murder (or accidental killing) in recent times…just seems too far fethched.
Not quite the point I was making. They were not “historic” at the time of their occurrence. Lots of powerful people were fucking children, and getting away with it. Lots of powerful people are still fucking children, and still getting away with it.
Somewhere in that above short paragraph – there is a constant.
Somewhere in that constant – there are ‘enablers’.
Originally posted by Gay Abandon
If I was the Policeman, would I publish a book with my findings and conclusions, or would I keep digging and accumulating eveidence so that ultimately there is no dout and no chance of avoiding the courtroom?
Pap has covered that. And he is correct. Also in that truth best reveals itself to you when it is sought and discovered for oneself.
But as I have previously stated (and I wasn’t plucking it out of my ass, not that I’m suggesting for a moment that you thought or inferred I was - I’m just saying) that Gordon Brown refused point blank to sign off on the Lisbon Treaty that was under negotiation at that time, until he had been personally informed by the then Portuguese PM, that GA had been fired as Lead Investigator (GB knew before GA himself was even told!) – and that he had been given a cast iron guarantee that the McCanns would make it back to the UK without charge. Once that had occured, the treaty was signed.
As Pap has said on a few occasions now – the Portuguese investigations did not have insufficient evidence against the McCanns, they had shitloads of it. They were simply not allowed to do anything with it, due to instructions from ‘on high’. That is the point. They were not allowed to see the case through to fruition, because of political pressure from the highest levels of government (in particular, ours).
The McCann’s initial legal team in Portugal, told Kate at one point: “You are very lucky that you are not Portuguese. Or you would already be in jail by now.”
I don’t think that generally, you are still quite getting that which I am as subtly as possible trying to nod toward here.
The whole holiday was not simply a “family vacation” as was portrayed (or you could say “came out”) in the media (which was, as Clarence Mitchell has already told us from the horse’s mouth - ‘under his control’).
I have on a number of occasions now, alluded to “other guests”, who were both powerful and influential, who were visiting this “holiday” (of the nature described by the good Dr. Katherina Gaspar). This is not a “theory” of mine – but rather – a reality that is being “controlled” so that it does not “come out in the media”. I cannot tell you the names of these important “elite” people, as by the time I awoke in the morning, Carter Ruck would be ruining my life forever.
But for pure example – and I cannot stress clearly enough that the names I am about to use _ were not _ (to the best of my knowledge at least, lol) in anyway involved in what happened in Praia da Luz, I am using them purely to illustrate a point.
Imagine that this “under-age swinging club” was visited by Prince Charles, David Cameron, and Lord Rothschild (_ it wasn’t _, but humour me for a moment). Imagine that during one of the ‘sessions’ that occurred during the “the frequent comings and goings at Apartment 5A that week” (phrase from a witness statement in the PJ files) – these incredibly powerful and important people were present, when a “terrible accident” happened. Or, as Gerry McCann might say (and did, when phoning home upon the “discovery” that Madeleine was “missing”) - “There has been a disaster! It is an absolute disaster!” (curious choice of words to announce the “disappearance” of your daughter with, to your family. A disaster is what happens when something goes badly wrong).
But I digress. Imagine that these incredibly powerful and important people were present during the “disaster” (thanks Gerry). Can you then see that this might suddenly become the “matter of National Security” that the British Goverment refer to it as when rejecting Freedom of Information Requests regarding details of the McCann case?
Now – replace those completely innocent names that I used, with those who were actually there.
Do you now understand what I’m trying to say, without actually saying it? (For some reason that last sentence sounds a bit terse, but I assure it is not meant that way). 
And if so, does that help you to more clearly understand why some might move heaven and earth to ‘cover it up’?
You have the body of a dead child, that for “whatever reasons”, it is imperative is never subjected to an autopsy. Because if it was, you might say it would be something of a “disaster” for some. What then?
A staged abduction is what. All the focus upon the poor grieving parents, as our friend Clarence is busy “controlling what comes out in the media”. Family holiday, focus purely on them, and their handful of friends – no one need know (and nor will they) that anyone else was even there, or had anything to do with it. Because Clarence is controlling what comes out in the media.
I’m trying the best I can, to say what needs to be said, without actually saying it. Because if I did – it would be very bad for all concerned. 
It’s late, and I’m tired. Let me know if you’re catching my drift. 
