I fell like I post people post, I bring people together, Father Barry.
Right, Iāve read pages 3 and 4 of this thread.
Twice.
Youāre going to have to work with me for that apology Barry.
What, specifically *, in pages 3 and 4, makes you feel Iāve somehow not discharged my duties and earned my moderation wages.
Was it this from that vindictive bastard, Halo?
*Here, specifically means āspecificallyā.
Snide remark as well, Iāll be keeping an eye out from now on.
Is that for me, Barry?
Ok, assuming it is. That sort of trips the restriction that I put on this little chat weāre havingā¦
I should warn you in advance that if you bring other issues into this specific discussion, dissemble, obfuscate or change tack, Iāll drag you back to the two issues above. Once weāve addressed those, Iāll happily discuss other things with you - each on the same restrictive terms.
So, letās drag it backā¦
- Point to the bits you find objectionable and Iāll do the best I can to defend myself and my actions.
If I feel Iāve let you down, I will apologise.
- Why werenāt you here for 24 hours, and why do you apparently feel that I should have known that you werenāt here for 24 hours? The implication you seem to be making is that as you werenāt here to defend yourself, I should have somehow known this fact and then moderated differently.
So where are we?
On 2) I think youāve addressed that. Youāve said
- Of course you couldnāt know I was going to be off for 24 hours but if I am not posting and this goes for any poster under the circumstances and theyāre being prodded and having snide remarks about them then of course some intejection wouldnāt go amiss.
So here you feel that I should have protected you from snide remarks - whilst also generously recognising that I didnāt know you wouldnāt be online for 24 hours such that you might need me to protect you from snide remarks.
Guilty, I really canāt read minds.
Guilty, I donāt know your exact movements or planned schedule for posting.
Guilty, I didnāt realise you were so sensitive to snide remarks.
In mitigation, I donāt really see it as my job to protect you from snide remarks.
So, humble and heartfelt apologies if that makes you that think Iāve let you down throughout this episode.
OK, on to thisā¦
- Point to the bits you find objectionable and Iāll do the best I can to defend myself and my actions.
Well, here youāve generously pointed me towards pages 3 and 4, but stopped short of identifying the exact content that makes you feel Iāve let you down.
Is it safe for me to assume that in answer to my question/task 1), it is just some snide remarks on pages 3 and 4 that make you feel Iāve somehow let you down?
(all of this against a backdrop of you recently calling someone a cunt and offering to fight them)
Stay with it, Barry.
Stay on track and we might resolve this situation to both our satisfaction.
Fair comments Bletch, but does anyone take any notice of downvotes?
Barry a valued contributor, I am walking in the clouds.
I now have an image of you in my head, skipping down the road with your dog whilst singing that Aled Jones snowman song
To me, forums are a source of light relief and I donāt normally get involved in the āseriousā threads. I read them with interest, have an opinion on them most certainly but debating is just not my thing. I tend to keep things under my hat, I find it makes life easier.
However things have got so fuckinā ridiculous on here that I felt drawn to contribute my thoughts on things in an attempt to calm things down a bit. Iāve been a bit taken aback by the bitterness Iāve been reading, the polar opposite to what drew me to Papsweb in the the first place.
Firstly Iāll fess up to being a Barry sympathiser over this. Iāve got nothing against Cherts, infact I like his direct approach to posting but I reckon heās been well out of order. Not especially for his paedo remark which whilst ill considered, was abuse hurled in anger in the heat of the moment. I fully understand that different people have differing sensibilities, Iām just not easily offended personally.
What has bothered me thoā has been Cherts unique brand of McCarthyism in relentlessly trying to out Barry as a a racist, which I donāt really see myself. Itās been going on almost as long as Iāve been on here and Iāve found it pretty distasteful at times with more than hint of bullying about it imho. So Barryās got concerns about the countries social wellbeing with immigration and interegration being part of it. So what, heās allowed to be concerned and whist he might not make his point very clearly, it certainly doesnāt make him a racist, something that heās tried to get across to Cherts on numerous occasions to no effectā¦
Anyway, itās a shame that Cherts has decided not to post anymore and whilst I hope he comes back, I wonāt be missing that spiteful side of him. Just my thoughts anyway and whilst Iām not expecting universal agreement with me, Iāve got it off my chest.
Finally, to Barry, how about we all put this to bed now. Everyoneās seriously fed up with the whole business and Sotonians morale seem pretty low at the moment. Christmas with all its joyousness (stress) is just around the corner and peace and goodwill to all men (and women) is pretty much compulsory. More importantly itās your first Crimbo with you new nipper, you need to be focusing on that instead of bickering on here mate.
I totally agree, indeed youāre correct and right, lets put this to bed.
Originally posted by @steveintheforest
Finally, to Barry, how about we all put this to bed now. Everyoneās seriously fed up with the whole business and Sotonians morale seem pretty low at the moment.
I agree with much of what youāve written but not this bit. The fallout of the Baz/Cherts fight was dealt with with humour but many posters. Yesterday was an amusing day to be posting. Admittedly, after the humour it went a bit bitter, but there were definitely belly laughs from my end. I donāt see low morale. I saw a dispute that was joked about and dealt with well. That should have been a sign to end it all there and then but a couple of people prolonged the idiocy.
morale is high, Steve in the forest. Keep saying it, morale is high. Morale is high.
It was going gangbusters up until the point Pap finished his 9 hour day and got involved
oh sorry, my bad ⦠Iām an over sensetive critter at times
Morale is high, Morale is High,
MORALE IS HIGH
⦠as will I be, for the next 2 weeks
Thatās my New Yearās resolution sorted then! Note to self, need to down vote more!
And the rest, mate. Got two jobs until the end of the year. Just have a nine hour block where I have to be in a specific place.
Originally posted by @steveintheforest
What has bothered me thoā has been Cherts unique brand of McCarthyism in relentlessly trying to out Barry as a a racist, which I donāt really see myself. Itās been going on almost as long as Iāve been on here and Iāve found it pretty distasteful at times with more than hint of bullying about it imho. So Barryās got concerns about the countries social wellbeing with immigration and interegration being part of it. So what, heās allowed to be concerned and whist he might not make his point very clearly, it certainly doesnāt make him a racist, something that heās tried to get across to Cherts on numerous occasions to no effectā¦
It bothered me too, and not just because of what Cherts was up to. It _might _have created a culture where other people laid into him as well, although I fully accept that Baz doesnāt need Cherts to wind people up.
Bletch has got the right of it, imo. The only thing Iād add is something Iāve already said; I personally downvote when I think something is for want of a better term, unSotonian (blimey now Iām into the McCarthyism). For example, when Cherts and Baz were spending pages calling each other cunts, they both got downvotes from yours truly. I wonāt downvote for an honestly expressed difference of opinion, even if itās delivered in an unwieldy fashion.
IMHO this thread has proved one thing.
This site needs a better way of showing quoted posts. It has done my poor head in trying to follow the Beltch v Bazza diatribe.
Perhaps SteveWeb could help?
Iām open to that. The honest answer on development is that Iāve just got to get my arse in gear on Sotonians stuff. I am not a super-duper games programmer like a couple on here, but as far as general comfort with computers goes, Iām a Mongolian horseman born in the saddle.
Thereās loads that Iād like to do, and I should have some solid blocks of time to do it in the near future. Iām massively oversubscribed in terms of work at the moment; Iām working most of Christmas to get it all done. After that, it gets easier. The lovely thing about the new gig is that I canāt really do much of it when Iām not there. The crap thing about the old gig was that I never really got to switch off.
Another bonus of the new gig is that I can use my own equipment. Couldnāt in the other place. This means Iāll finally have a portable development laptop that I can do Sotonians stuff on.
Thanks to all that have impugned ye olde development skills in recent weeks. Underpromising and overdelivering should be a cinch.
Interesting stuff, tell us more.
Originally posted by @Tokyo-Saint
Interesting stuff, tell us more.
Ricky Gervais is out there, just waiting for a Gareth Google.
Sorry cuntgoblin, couldnāt resist. loged in once at lunch timeish and saw bletch was getting ear raped by your mate and thought iād check out if it was still happening. Saw poster of the year 2016 was in full force and wanted more info on your facebook style posts. I can see evening is dream team crew and you have killed off anyone decent so will leave you to it. Enjoy.