Day 23 in the Chinese laundry washing money house

So you agree that we need to be cautious with our spending and not make kneejerk player purchases that we might not be able to afford in the future? That’s 2 u-turns in one thread Baz I’m struggling to keep up :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:

10 Likes

No because this was done a while ago, is boils down to either believing you want to gamble to keep us in the division? Are you happy with the strikeforce? If you are you don’t buy, players coming here will have massive release clauses if we get relegated, we wouldn’t lose much but we would lose out, not as much as £100-£120 million, how big are your balls?

1 Like

How do you feel about missing out on Aaron Lennon Barry? Gutted?

I would deffo buy someone pls. But only if I think they’re really good! I would buy 2 or 3!

I know what you mean about gamble though. I might go to the owners and say, I want to buy two players for £30m each and make them both our top earners. It should help us stay up, but if we do it and still go down we won’t be able to cover the additional cost, so you’ll have to stump up personally mate.

Would rather have him at £1.5 Million a good signing, Walcott at £20 Million and £100,000 a week is laughable, absolutely laughable.

He’ll be good at Burnley I reckon, who have we got, Redmond?

Sit down, be quiet.

I would buy a striker, so by that you agree I have big balls? Glad we can put that one to bed :lou_smiley:

You keep big balls and going to bed out of fooball.

So let me get this right. If you had woken up to the news that we had signed Aaron Lennon for £1.5m in a bid to stave off relegation you wouldnt have gone into instant meltdown?

:lou_facepalm_2:

1 Like

Let me get this straight, I’d wouldn’t but the bellends didn’t and were genuinely going for Walcott at that money, that says all you need to know about the x box, the scouts and Fat Les.

So you think we were wrong to go for Walcott rather than Lennon?

1 Like

I’ve heard it all now! Fkn hell.

I’m not a mega Walcott fan, but he’d have been a fuck load more use to us than Lennon.

2 Likes

Really? For what, what hairdo not to get?

How not to cross a ball?

How to drift in a career for over 10 years?

1.5m…FFS all Lennon is good for is filling an empty space on a teamsheet. Give me a fuckin’ ballpoint and I’ll do it for nothing! :lou_eyes_to_sky:

Walcott? £20 Million?

For the goals b. I’d have him making them cute runs inside the full back all day long, place it inside the far post. He’s good at that srs. I’ve seen him score loads of goals like that.

I mean, I would also have to sign someone capable of playing a fkn through ball, but at least it’s a plan. I dunno what the fuck I’d do with Lennon. He’s worse than Redmond.

6 Likes

An underrated skill if the money is right…

No he aint ha ha!

Holy fuck Baz, how many transfer related threads have you started or dragged down to your level of negativity this week 6? 7? I’ve lost count…

How’s about you start a final one tomorrow and just stick to posting on that until the end of the month?

#shoutingatclouds

@barry-sanchez - if you don’t calm it down I’m going to have to do another flowchart.

It would mean having to read all these shitberg threads you’ve started all over the site, but it’ll probably boil down to you not liking Saints very much, and wanting to drag everyone into your fucking swamp.

It is fucking tedious, mucker, and increasingly serious. When you’ve got bletch, one of the most chill people ever to grace an internet forum, starting threads about your tedium, you know you’ve got problems.

Turn it the fuck in. Please.

5 Likes

Thank you @pap

2 Likes