:covid_19: đŸ˜· đŸ„ Corona Virus the thread for all your fears ❓

You posted a link to an article in which an article in the Guardian was being accused of downplaying the level of lethality of the 1918-19 pandemic. In the original Guardian article an estimate of 2.5% was mentioned as the lowest level of such estimates. Nobody really knows the lethality rate of that virus. All numbers are estimates, both numbers of infections and numbers of deaths caused by it.

A single article in a single newspaper, that doesn’t even say definitively that the mortality rate of the 1918-19 virus was 2.5%, is scarcely a revision of history.

So, this was the figures in the article when it was first written in 2004 :-

The ‘’‘Spanish Flu Pandemic’’’ (also known as the ‘’‘Great Influenza Pandemic’’’, the ‘’‘1918 Flu Epidemic’’’, and ‘’‘La Gripe’’’) was an unusually severe and deadly strain of [[influenza]], a [[virus|viral]] [[infectious]] [[disease]], that killed some 25 million to 40 million people (possibly significantly more) world-wide in [[1918]] and [[1919]]. It is thought to have been the most deadly [[pandemic]] so far in human [[history]], killing more people than the [[Black Plague]] or [[AIDS]].

25 to 40 million deaths, doesn’t give a number as to how many were infected world wide.

current article states

17 to 50 millions deaths and possibly as high as 100 million (out of 500 million infected)

In fact it’s the old article that states global morbidity was 2.5% of the population with 20% infected

But it’s the same as the reaction in Italy, France, Austria, Germany, Denmark


I share your concern about imposition of special powers, particularly with no vote in parliament taking place. But if the reaction of our government is stage managed, then they’ve picked the worst director in the world to do it. Their response has appeared bumbling and uncertain, which is hardly what I’d expect if the whole thing were being stage managed.

2 Likes

It’s been accepted for decades that it’s between 10-20%.
The guardian journalist in question even wrote a book saying so. I also posted about Wikipedia revising the figures.
Don’t you find the timing strange?

It’s hardly strange that a lot of articles about the 1918-19 pandemic are being published, nor that comparisons are being drawn between the current pandemic and that one. I don’t see some all-encompassing plan behind it all, just authorities in different countries trying to deal with it, with varying levels of success. If there is indeed a great plan in play (which presumably invovles the governments of a large number of countries, many of whom are scarcely on friendly terms with each other, and also extends to changing Wikipedia), then what is its ultimate goal?

1 Like

The generally accepted figures were 50-100m out of 500m infected.
I don’t know about the old article, but i don’t look at Wikipedia as it is constantly edited, but if you look into Spanish flu 50-100m are the accepted figures.

Comparisons are fine. Rewriting the death toll not so much.
I have no idea why it’s being so over played, but the money the fed have been pumping in to try to save the financial sector can’t go on. Then again it could just be power hungry people taking the opportunity to grab more.
The fear seems massively out of proportion and the powers to much and for far too long. We know they always use any opportunity to fuck us over and a bit of fear seems to get people clamouring to give their rights away.

Where has the death toll been rewritten? I haven’t seen anything that claims the death toll in the 1918-19 pandemic was lower than you’re saying.

I’ve just shown you the revisions for the WikiPedia article where the estimates of the death toll have actually gone up from when the original article was written, in fact the current article agrees (broadly) with the figures you stated



from they BBC
 is this the Photo posted earlier on this thread?

False reports of tanks and troops in the UK

Social media and WhatsApp in Britain are buzzing with pictures and videos of troops and tanks, purportedly showing them moving in and around London - you may have received the images too. But the pictures are not what they seem, report our colleagues.

One image shows military vehicles driving along a road, and some people on social media claim it’s showing preparations around London. But the vehicles are driving on the right-hand side of the road. The photo first appeared on online in Ukraine earlier in the week and are at least three days old – they only surfaced on British social media accounts yesterday.

In another photo, which appears to show tanks under covers, the number plates aren’t British.Emergency planning is taking place in the UK but beware rumours circulating online. The Telegraph reported that the capital might be locked down “by the weekend”. Ministers say that there are no plans to do this at the moment but Boris Johnson said he would “rule nothing out” when asked about a possible London shutdown.

As always, be cautious about what you see on social media and WhatsApp.

Isn’t spanish flu that powder you’re supposed to slip in your bird’s drink to make her horny? :thinking:

5 Likes

Don’t you get put it up her flu when you’re on holiday for a treat hence its called Spanish Flu?

4 Likes

You disgust me. :rage:

3 Likes

I see the FDA in the US have said Hydroxychloroquine has been approved and being made available for prescription immediately.

4 Likes

Yup, listen to the oracle @Map-Of-Tasmania and funnel that Ibuprofen down your throat.

I has been used on victims in Australia with very good results
I posted a video about it yesterday.

Sorry, I meant to highlight the feeling nature of what Trump said


1 Like